In the wake of a Nigerian man's failed attempt to blow up a flight over Detroit on Christmas Day with explosives hidden in his underwear, government officials, especially in Europe, now want full-body scanners to screen all passengers before flights.
Many are still debating the pros -- namely that they can spot the tools Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab allegedly snuck in before they get on the plane, cutting off al-Qaeda's best route of attack -- and the cons -- which range from privacy concerns to the idea that the scanners, a response to the latest attempt, will be outdated by the time terrorists institute the new plans they're probably already dreaming up.
But the New Scientist tells us that there's a problem -- the devices aren't quite ready for use everywhere:
Their efforts could be stymied by the fact that the scanner technology has not yet been certified as fit for purpose by national governments – and manufacturers will not invest in mass production until it has.
So says Colin McSeveny, a spokesman for Smiths Detection of Watford, UK, which makes millimetre-wave body scanners. "Politicians like Gordon Brown want to get a move on, but these technologies are still in trials. They are not ready yet.
Body-scanner approvals are on the agenda at a meeting of British officials today, the New Scientist says.
You may also like
You need to be logged in to comment.
(If there's one thing we know about comment trolls, it's that they're lazy)