Matthew Duss

Matthew Duss is president of the Foundation for Middle East Peace and a contributing writer for the Prospect. You can follow him on Twitter @mattduss.

Recent Articles

WHERE DID I COME FROM? WHERE AM I GOING? WHY DOESN'T SHORT ROUND CALL?

WHERE DID I COME FROM? WHERE AM I GOING? WHY DOESN'T SHORT ROUND CALL? I read today that the leaked title of the new Indiana Jones movie is Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull . I can only suspect that the plot of the movie involves the getting of said skull. I must admit I'm still quite bitter about my own script being rejected. I think Indiana Jones and the Search for Tenure dealt with some important questions raised by the first three films, such as: With all of his swinging around in temples and shooting Nazis and being dragged behind trucks, when did he find time to publish? Surely Jones' global adventuring on the History Department's dime made him some enemies in the administration? Think about it: The Ark's in a government warehouse, the Shankara Stone he gave back to the village, and the Grail fell down a big crack in the temple floor. What does Jones have to show for all his time away, other than enormous expense reports, various scars, and a thousand-yard...

OSAMA'S STEALING MY RIFFS!

OSAMA'S STEALING MY RIFFS! Apparently, in the Sheikh's latest joint, Osama bin Laden quotes from Richard Perle and David Frum 's book, An End to Evil . Frum complains that he was misquoted. Let's compare. Osama: "And among the most important items contained in Bush's speeches since the events of the 11th is that the Americans have no option but to continue the war. This tone is in fact an echoing of the words of the words of neoconservatives like Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Richard Perle, that latter having said previously that the Americans have no choice in front of them than to continue the war or face a holocaust." Frum and Perle: "For us, terrorism remains the great evil of our time, and the war against this evil, our generation's great cause. We do not believe that Americans are fighting this war to minimize it or to manage it. We believe they are fighting to win - to end this evil before it kills again and on a genocidal scale. There is no middle way for Americans: It is victory or...

STRATEGIC VISION.

STRATEGIC VISION. White House homeland security adviser Fran Townsend , commenting on Osama bin Laden 's latest video yesterday: "This is a man on the run in a cave who is virtually impotent other than his ability to get these messages out," Townsend said on CNN's "Late Edition." "It is propaganda." Well, yeah, that's what bin Laden is, what he's always been: a propagandist. Declaring him "impotent" is like declaring Ronald McDonald "ineffective" for not actually going in and cooking the burgers himself. Like Ronald, Osama's role is to embody and promote the brand. Popping up every few years to say "Ha, ha, here I am!" and recite some Arabic verse is all he really needs to do to function as an effective spokesmodel. As for who's really running the show, yesterday the Washington Post had a story on al-Qaeda strategist Ayman al-Zawahiri , who has been hard at work rebuilding and refocusing the organization while President Bush posed in a flight suit. "While bin Laden putters about in...

464 PAGES OF OLD MEN PLEASURING THEMSELVES.

464 PAGES OF OLD MEN PLEASURING THEMSELVES. That would have been a more appropriate title for Peter Beinart ’s entirely too-kind review of the new cri de wars by Norman Podhoretz and Michael Ledeen . While Beinart capably dismantles the two mens' war-porn, the review is shot through with his desire to maintain his reputation as a serious, reasonable liberal by treating conservative ideas as if they were serious and reasonable, and Podhoretz's and Ledeen's ideas are neither. As Beinart points out, Podhoretz can't even be bothered to differentiate between the various groups in the Middle East, preferring instead to skip the boring research and move right to the part where he gets to sling accusations of treason (like everything else in the book, completely unsubstantiated, when not simply false) at his various political enemies. Beinart recognizes Podhoretz's "incessant use of violent imagery to describe American politics" but is unwilling to recognize that vicarious violence as a means...

THE TRANSMITTER.

THE TRANSMITTER. William F. Buckley praises Norman Podhoretz 's World War IV , in which Rudy Giulani 's foreign policy brain essentially argues that we should give bin Laden exactly what he wants, which is a war between Islam and the West. At one point in the article, in what I can only describe as a Russian nested doll of alarmist jingoism, we have Buckley quoting Podhoretz quoting Daniel Pipes on the severity of the Islamist threat, with Pipes laying out various potential scenarios in which Islamic extremism could be, like, the worst thing ever, if any of those scenarios came to pass. The rest of Podhoretz's book is, in my view, a pretty good blueprint for making absolutely sure that those scenarios came to pass. Buckley wraps it up: "Recognition, then, of the scale of the pretensions of the Islamist enemy has to precede substantial measures against it. In the matter of Iraq, for instance, the ambiguity of our engagement and the enlarging political cry against it would alter...

Pages