Paul Waldman

Paul Waldman is the Prospect's daily blogger and senior writer. He also blogs for the Plum Line at the Washington Post, and is the author of Being Right is Not Enough: What Progressives Must Learn From Conservative Success.

Recent Articles

Kathleen Parker Says You Are Not Mainstream.

Are you a "mainstream" American? Probably not, according to The Washington Post 's Kathleen Parker . In a column today criticizing President Obama 's pick of Elena Kagan for the Supreme Court, Parker writes that Kagan just isn't mainstream enough: Certainly New York City dwellers would argue that they struggle with ordinary concerns, just in a more dense environment. But New York, like other urban areas, tends to be more liberal than the vast rest of the country. More than half the country also happens to be Protestant, yet with Kagan, the court will feature three Jews, six Catholics and nary a Protestant. Fewer than one-fourth of Americans are Catholic, and 1.7 percent are Jewish. One does not have to be from a rural Georgia backwater ( Clarence Thomas ), or the child of recently arrived immigrants ( Antonin Scalia and Samuel Alito ), to qualify as a justice, though it might help in claiming identity with ordinary people. One could even argue that it matters only that one regard the...

Maryland Is for Lovers.

According to a new poll from The Washington Post , folks in Maryland are warming to gay marriage: Maryland residents are shifting toward a more positive opinion of same-sex marriage, with registered voters now narrowly supporting a law to allow it, a Washington Post poll has found. A clear majority of people responding to the poll -- 55 percent -- also say that if gays get married in another state, those unions should be considered legal in Maryland; 38 percent say the state should not recognize them. Maryland Attorney General Douglas F. Gansler (D) in February told state agencies to begin granting married same-sex couples from elsewhere the same rights as Maryland's heterosexual couples. The poll, conducted May 3-6, finds that 46 percent overall favor legal same-sex marriage, 44 percent oppose it, and 10 percent have no opinion. Among registered voters, 48 percent are in favor and 43 percent are opposed. The opinion Gansler issued, which has been supported by Gov. Martin O'Malley ,...

The Cost of Iraq.

The Center for American Progress has tallied up the costs of the war in Iraq ( read the report here ), and according to their calculations, we've spent $748 billion, with up to $717 more coming in veterans' benefits. I thought it might be useful to compare this to our previous wars, so using data from this Congressional Research Service report , and adjusting the CAP figures to 2008 dollars to make it all comparable, I made this graph: Quite something -- Iraq will end up costing us more than any war except World War II. But what about casualties, you might be asking? It's been a while since we were all aware of the running tally of the number of men and women who have died in Iraq. But here are the numbers (data from here ): Of course, that doesn't count Iraqi casualties, which CAP says number at least 9,451 from the Iraqi Security Forces, and between 96,037 and 104,754 civilians. -- Paul Waldman

Citizen Ex

Democracy is hard, but sacrificing our values won't make it any easier.

When Faisal Shahzad attempted to explode his absurdly amateurish car bomb in Times Square and was quickly caught, the response was one we've come to expect. It didn't matter how forthcoming Shahzad was -- some conservatives were terribly disappointed that he wasn't being tortured and characterized the whole thing as evidence of the Obama administration's unconscionable weakness. For some reason, they decided to focus on the Miranda warning we've seen recited on television thousands of times. "They Mirandized him, which I always find stupid on the part of our people," said Sen. Orrin Hatch. For some, the idea that when an American is arrested for a crime in America, we should apply American laws to him is incomprehensible. A creative solution was soon found: Why not just wave a magic wand and declare him a foreigner, so we could stop worrying about laws and the Constitution? Sen. Joe Lieberman stepped up to the plate, with a proposal to strip citizenship from people who are suspected...

A Modest Proposal: No Pundit Day

On Sunday, The Washington Post asked various famous people for suggestions of "things we should toss." The results were somewhat interesting, particularly one: Donna Brazile , one of the country's best-known pundits, suggested that we ought to get rid of pundits . Just try to imagine it for a moment: no more Pat Buchanan s, no more James Carville s, no more "Democratic strategists" and "Republican strategists" filling your ears with mindless speculation and ridiculous talking points. Is it impossible? Not really, but it would be very hard. Media outlets, particularly television ones, rely on pundits mostly for practical reasons. If you need to fill up 24 hours a day with chatter, pundits are a reliable and easily accessed resource. They live in Washington, so the network doesn't have to pay to use a remote studio to talk to them. They make it their business to be available on a moment's notice. Their opinions are predictable and they know how to deliver sound bites, so producers know...

Pages