Archive

  • WAR SUPPORTERS' LAST THROES.

    WAR SUPPORTERS' LAST THROES. Everyone's getting their digs in on Rich Lowry and Bill Kristol �s "More troops to Iraq!" column in The Washington Post , as, indeed, they should. But I think today's chutzpah award has to go to TNR 's Lawrence Kaplan, who has a new article hectoring pro-withdrawal commentators for feeling insufficiently bad about the sectarian bloodletting that will likely accelerate in the absence of the current buffer provided by U.S. forces. "The moral cost of abandoning a country we have turned inside-out seems not to have made the slightest impression on opinion-makers," he writes. This is not actually true -- plenty of advocates for withdrawal have wrestled soberly and in earnest with the likely consequences for Iraqis of an American withdrawal. ( Matt 's dispatch in the September print issue argues explicitly that dynamics have reached a point in the Iraqi civil war such that neither withdrawal nor some other drastic American policy change, including the secure-...
  • A DIFFERENT LOOK AT 9-11.

    A DIFFERENT LOOK AT 9-11. The leading lights of conservative thought labor through the day to produce enough big fish to fill enough small barrels. A woman casts herself wistfully as the Mrs. Miniver of World War III (or IV.) The editor of Commentary wallows in existential dread and can't keep it from between his toes. A suburban dad is baffled as to why he -- and his local Best Buy -- are not living their lives in a garrison state, and is even more confused about whether or not that's a good thing. The second generation of the Pipes family looks around for another threat to which he can attach the family helium bottle. And the World's Second-Most Annoying Canadian -- David Frum 's retired the Champion's Cup, alas -- once again wins a round of the JEOPARDY home game against two opponents made entirely of straw. Of course, it's the liberals who are bereft of ideas. Gaze in awe. --Charles P. Pierce
  • GOREWATCH. Pat...

    GOREWATCH. Pat Buchanan , no stranger to insurgent candidacies, is arguing that Al Gore is well-placed to defeat Hillary Clinton and take the Democratic nomination. Most of his points are, I think, perceptive and convincing, but his final grafs falter. "Hillary," Buchanan writes, "has the option of waiting much longer to decide when and whether to get in. Gore must decide soon after November." I think it's quite the opposite. As I argued in my profile of Gore, the longer he stays out, the stronger his chances of winning become. Were he to enter early, the initial shock would wear off and the psychodrama of Gore versus Clinton would emerge, harming and marginalizing both candidates. More likely is the scenario wherein Gore enters late in 2007, becoming the exciting deus-ex-machina candidate of the race. If Hillary is dominant but not thrilling, or absent but not replaced, Gore could enter as the bigfoot the Democratic base (and media) was waiting for, grabbing headlines, attention, and...
  • CHOOSING FRANK LUNTZ...

    CHOOSING FRANK LUNTZ OVER DARFUR. If the political dynamic surrounding Darfur remains static, the region has about three weeks before African Union forces are replaced by the Sudanese military and its genocidal proxies. Meanwhile, Kofi Annan is struggling to sound the alarm on the sheer urgency of the crisis. Yesterday, he appeared in person before the Council and, in an attempt to raise the individual Council members to action, gave a rather stirring speech . In unusually blunt language, Annan called on �additional voices� (read: key member states like China, Russia, and the United States) to do their utmost to press Sudan to consent to a U.N. peacekeeping operation for Darfur. But rather than stick around to give the American response, sources tell me that Ambassador Bolton skipped out of the briefing immediately following Annan�s speech. And though other permanent representatives, such as Emyr Jones Parry of the United Kingdom, stayed, Bolton dispatched only a mid-level �minister...
  • FIGHTING BACK.

    FIGHTING BACK. When we last checked in , the Corner's Cliff May had used the occasion of croc hunter Steve Irwin 's death to mount a sustained stingray-as-Islamofascism metaphor , noting that "every stingray is a very real and present danger." It appears that Australians may have missed the metaphor part of May's call to arms and are retaliating swiftly against stingrays all along the country's eastern coast. Australians' resolve is both notable and admirable, but there's clearly a danger of going too far here. What's needed is for a leader to calm the nation, as President Bush did in his famous Friday speech after 9-11, and emphasize that this is not a war against stingrays -- a species of peace -- but rather those who would tarnish that noble species' name through terror. --Sam Rosenfeld
  • LIVE LONG AND...

    LIVE LONG AND PROSPER, DEPNDING ON WHO YOU ARE. I talk a lot about health care and economic inequality, but too rarely about health inequality . But a new study out today sheds some light on this issue: If you subdivide various demographics, you find life expectancies differ by decades, with some American groups exhibiting outcomes more typical of developing nations. Indeed, if you compare Asian women with urban black men, you see a life expectancy difference of 21 years. That's huge. So much as I'd like to blame this on a lack of insurance and care disparities, actual medical coverage probably accounts for only a small portion of the inequality. Lifestyle factors -- notably stress, obesity, diet, smoking, exercise, etc. -- were the primary determinants. Some of it, like diet and stress, connects heavily to economic inequality, some is cultural. But, when taken together, the difference is shaving decades off the life of massive swaths of America. The article also ranks the states by...
  • THANK YOU FOR...

    THANK YOU FOR CARING. This morning, on NPR's The Diane Rehm Show , NATO Commander Gen. James L. Jones, Jr. , who is leading NATO efforts in Afghanistan, thanked the host for showing "interest" in "this important part of the world." He sounded truly grateful. That, on the day after the fifth anniversary of al Qaeda's attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center, and given the current chaos and killing in that troubled land, the general should be in anything other than extreme demand as a talk-show guest is downright pathetic. NATO appears to have led successful attacks, killing hundreds of Taliban fighters in recent weeks, but the Taliban remain strong and resurgent. Recently, a provincial Afghan governor was assassinated by the Taliban. Then, marchers in the governor's funeral procession were killed. Calls by NATO brass for more troops for the Afghan campaign have so far gone unheeded by the alliance's member countries. And precious little has been done to create any kind of...
  • JUST POSTED ON TAP ONLINE: TOO MUCH INFORMATION.

    JUST POSTED ON TAP ONLINE: TOO MUCH INFORMATION. Since the president and his team are going on the offensive once again in touting their tough security posture in the war on terror, it's worth emphasizing a point: Moral qualms aside, pervasive surveillance and torture don't actually serve as effective investigative techniques, as Matt reminds us today. They produce bad info, and way, way too much of it. --The Editors
  • EARMARKS.

    EARMARKS. In his triumphant New Republic debut, Brad Plumer makes the liberal case for pork. "It's not," he writes , "because pork projects are defensible on the merits, although they sometimes can be. It's not because they create jobs, although they can do that, too. Rather, it's because, without pork, activist government would wither and die." Using the examples of Reagan 's 1986 Tax Reform and Clinton 's first budget, he explains that pork are bargaining chits that allow tough, controversial pieces of legislation to squeeze through the legislative process. I'll buy that, but I wonder if it's not becoming a relatively obsolete consideration: As Congress continues evolving into a more parliamentary institution and party loyalty grows easier to enforce, I think we'll begin seeing an easier ride for tough legislation. Think of the Medicare Drug Bill, which was anathema to the left and a grotesque mutant to the right, but which nevertheless squeezed through. If massive legislation with...
  • Wal-Mart's Average Wages

    The NYT reported on Chicago Mayor Richard Daley's decision to veto an ordinance setting a higher minimum wage for large stores (e.g. Wal-Mart). After 2010, the law would have required large stores to pay workers at least $10 an hour, plus $3 an hour for benefits. The article concludes by presenting the assertion of a Wal-Mart spokesperson that the average wage for "full-time hourly associates" in Illinois is $10.41 an hour. Before anyone assumes that this means that Wal-Mart already pays more than the 2010 minimum imposed by the vetoed ordinance, it is important to remember that the spokesperson only referred to "full-time" employees. What percent of Wal-Mart's workforce is counted as full-time? I don't know this one offhand, and the article provides no guidance on this issue. Maybe they could have gotten this information if they had spoken to someone from an organization that is critical of Wal-Mart. --Dean Baker

Pages