Archive

  • PLAYED FOR SUCKERS.

    PLAYED FOR SUCKERS. Kevin Drum highlights the new Gallup poll showing a collapse in the GOP's typically overwhelming dominance among white religious voters. He notes at the end that "if even 5% of them stay home and another 5% switch to the Democrats, it's going to have a huge impact. David Kuo 's new book ought to help that along nicely." Indeed, Kuo's revelations aren't actually revelatory to most political observers, but a full and frank public discussion about the state of abject suckerdom to which the GOP has always confined its religious conservative base is always welcome. This time around, Tucker Carlson actually got things rolling before Kuo did. And really, noted political analyst Michael Scanlon laid the whole thing out -- the strategy, the attitude, the goals -- with pith and precision back in 2001: ""The wackos get their information through the Christian right. . . Simply put, we want to bring out the wackos to vote against something and make sure the rest of the public...
  • CAN THIS ARGUMENT...

    CAN THIS ARGUMENT BE SAVED? In response to my claim that the exemption of women from punishment under laws banning abortion is fatally incoherent, a commenter here (as a TAPPED commenter did earlier) invokes Ronald Dworkin's argument that abortion is a "cosmic shame" that nonetheless doesn't rise to the level of murder. The commenter says: I have some sympathy for that argument even though I don't accept the premise (that abortion is at least morally problematic because it shows "disrespect for life".) Dworkin argues that this is really the position of most abortion opponents- that they do not in fact think that abortion is murder, and that they don't think this is shown through their actions. That part seems exactly right...If you have a position like this it doesn't seem implausible that one might think that abortion should be illegal, but might still think that those having abortions should not punished. I don't find that an attractive option myself, and hope I'd not find it to be...
  • TAX-EXEMPT MONEY-LAUNDERING.

    TAX-EXEMPT MONEY-LAUNDERING. The Democrats on the Senate Finance Committee, led by Max Baucus , have put together a minority report (PDF) questioning the tax-exempt status of several of the non-profit organizations that apparently put dollars through the Maytag for the felonious Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff . (It should be noted that Finance committee chairman Chuck Grassley did sign off on the report.) Perhaps the biggest offender in the investigation is Grover Norquist 's Americans for Tax Reform , through which Norquist seems to have taken it upon himself to reform tax law directly by laundering the ducats marked by Abramoff for delivery to the likes of Ralph Reed . (Meanwhile, the once-cherubic face of Reed, the religious right's fallen angel, has taken on, during the course of his nefarious dealings, a certain Chucky esque quality .) From the report: Documents indicate ATR may have facilitated funds transfers to conceal the identity of Abramoff clients, possibly in exchange...
  • Are Falling Gas Prices Offsetting the Impact of Housing?

    The latest Fed Beige Book, which gives assessments on current economic conditions from the Fed's 12 regional banks, reportedly finds that the impact of falling gas prices is offsetting the impact of the weak housing market. This one doesn't sound quite right. The country buys approximately 130 billion gallons of gas annually. If we say that prices are down 80 cents a gallon from the spring peaks, this translates into savings of just over $100 billion annually. If 70 percent of this goes to consumers (a substantial portion of gasoline is used for commerical purposes), it means that lower gas prices will put another $70 billion a year in consumers pockets, compared to a situation in which gas had stayed at its peak prices. By contrast, homeowners are pulling more than $700 billion in equaity out of their homes. While the full impact of lower home prices will only be felt through time, given the small amount of equity that many homeowners have, this figure can easily fall by two-thirds,...
  • HOW DO YOU...

    HOW DO YOU SAY "SI SE PUEDE" IN CHINESE? Here's a very simple question: Do you think worker laws are too generous in China? Do you think employees there get paid too much, or treated too kindly? Well, America's corporations do. The Chinese government, concerned over the social effects of their rapid economic expansion, has proposed a raft of reforms that would actually create some standards floors for Chinese laborers: Unions will get new powers to negotiate wages, safety laws, benefits, and ground rules; layoffs will be somewhat harder; and the state will do more to ensure against the exploitation and mistreatment of ordinary Chinese. The legislation won't make the country into California, but it will make it less like, well, China. But for all their high rhetoric about worker's rights and treatment concerns, American corporations seem oddly opposed to the new laws. The American Chamber of Commerce -- representing, among others, Nike, Dell, Ford, Microsoft, and GE -- is staging an...
  • BEATS KEN BURNS.

    BEATS KEN BURNS. OK, so the Turkish guy seems like a real standup fella, but next year's Nobel better go to these folks or there will be all kinds of Swedish hell to pay. You wouldn't think there were that many people who could do Jonah Goldberg imitations, but, damn, this guy's good. By the way, note to all Rush Limbaugh fans and the insecure Beltway drones whom they make nervous -- this is what you call satire. Pass it on. --Charles P. Pierce
  • SADAT'S NEPHEW GETS IN TROUBLE.

    SADAT'S NEPHEW GETS IN TROUBLE. The 25-year anniversary of the assassination (video link) of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat passed last Friday without much hoopla here in Cairo. Many journalists, including my friend Zvika Krieger , used the occasion to reflect on Sadat's major legacy: the Camp David Accords . Sadat's nephew Talaat , for his part, has made a splash here by suggesting in different venues that current President Hosni Mubarak was involved in the assassination, and that the military guard looked the other way. A deputy in the Egyptian People's Assembly, Talaat had his parliamentary immunity stripped for making such allegations (slandering or otherwise insulting the president is a crime in Egypt) on an Al-Arabiya talk show. He also claims that the U.S. and Israel were in on the plot. The younger Sadat's trial began Wednesday in a military court (because he "insulted" the military in his comments). In an ironic twist, his lawyer is Montasser al-Zayyat , who was once the...
  • Lack Skills, But Need a Good Paying Job? Call the NYT

    Yes, Thomas Friedman is back (it's Times Select, so there's no linking). Mr. Friedman reports that voters want energy independence, but they are not prepared to support higher gas or BTU taxes. Instead he tells us that they want higher mileage standards and energy use regulations of the sort put in place by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger in California. Friedman's source on what voters support is Democratic political advisors James Carville and Stan Greenberg, who he tells us "are are professional campaign advisers. They get paid to get people elected � not to offer feel-good nostrums." Actually, I thought that people get elected by offering feel good nostrums. (They certainly don't have to offer to worry about tough analyses from the likes of Mr. Friedman.) In fact, the California regulations, while a step in the right direction, will not get us close to energy independence. We will have to go much further than these regulations, and maybe have a target date of something like 2050,...
  • A NEW CHAMP.

    A NEW CHAMP. This is even more evidence that the late Abe Rosenthal 's crown as Positively The Worst Published Writer Ever is being struck even more daily into the hazard by Marty Peretz . I won't bother totaling up the productive and talented people produced by places like Georgetown or Notre Dame. I won't even stick up for my own alma mater, Marquette University. Rather, I would just point out that, by any standard he has used in the past to glibly accuse someone of anti-Semitism, and even by the standards he uses in this very post, Peretz has written an opening paragraph of pure, old-fashioned American nativist anti-Catholicism. --Charles P. Pierce
  • SCHALLER V. SCHALLER....

    SCHALLER V. SCHALLER. I sort of hate to do this to Tom , but has he read his new book? I have, and really liked it. But it doesn't seem to say what he thinks it says. Below, Tom rails against me for skepticism that Democrats are going to find their greatest gains among state-hatin' libertarians, largely because he appears to think that means writing off the Interior West. Which it doesn't. The Interior West is trending left, in part, as Ryan Sager will tell you, because of a decidedly non-libertarian influx of Hispanic and Californian immigration, which Sager likens to "a bucket of blue paint spilled across the region." Happily, Tom's books show him prepared to appeal to these people on populist terms. Which made his post something of a surprise given that lbiertarians are not, shall we say, particularly inclined to agree with Tom's prescriptions. For instance, Tom blasts Democrats for supporting NAFTA, complaining that it's "a perfect example of how not to flag plant [build your...

Pages