• Blast From The Past

    You'll see.
  • Site Help

    Typepad suggested that I take the test site off the template this site is using and see if that fixes things. I'm skeptical, but now it's done. Did it fix things?
  • The Populist is Dead, Long Live the Populist!

    Matt's post using the liberal establishment's widespread apathy, and indeed, antipathy towards Dick Gephardt's candidacy as evidence that the designation "left" now turns more on things like war, the environment, and gay rights than on economic populism may be true, but I'm having trouble with it. Gephardt was abandoned by all sort and manner of folk because, after his time in the House, no one liked him. He was dull, ineffective, opportunistic -- yawns directed at his candidacy were aimed at the man, not the policy platform. That said, Edwards got a fair run of great press for seriously taking on poverty and making class an issue. Indeed, of all the candidates (save maybe Dean), he's the only one I hear anyone talking about in a policy sense, an odd outcome considering his reputation as a lightweight but a wholly understandable one if you think, as I do, that many Democrats are thirsting for an authentic populist. But when Edwards' populism-lite is sparking fires, you know you've a...
  • Site Stuff

    So...still problems, I take it? I'm corresponding with Typepad about what's going on, but they're not necessarily being too helpful. At least not yet. In comments, a lot of you are noticing bits of code that seem problematic. I didn't write the code and don't really know what to do with it. Shakespeare's Sister kindly did the work, but she's not a professional coder either. If any of you guys are professionals and feel like you could hunt around under the hood and clear up the contradictions, problems, and issues, I'd love for you to give it a try. The whole college thing makes me decidedly not rich, but I'll happily send someone $25 or $50 to blow at Amazon if they're willing to help out. So if you are an experienced coder willing to help me on the cheap, shoot me an e-mail .
  • Kerry 08 Can Wait

    James Joyner gets Kerry's problem right : Clinton has shrewdly focused on her Senate duties first, not only building chits within her party but demonstrating that she was more than a show pony. Kerry would be wise to do the same if he wants another shot at the brass ring. Kerry's problems, unfortunately, are innate. His every action comes across as that of a striver, a comer, an opportunist. It's not just that he lacks the effortless ascendence of yesteryear's wasp's and aristocrats, but he's also missing the self-evident social consciousness that distinguishes do-gooders. So when our inboxes fill up with his proposals to extend health care to the young or increase military pay, they seem less the ideas of a committed reformer and more a pre-plotted path Kerry's hoping will lead him to the White House. That's not his fault, at least in a conscious sense. I've no doubt Kerry does care for children, veterans, and society's least and needy, but his pre-2004 lack of distinguishing...
  • Protecting Predators

    Doesn't this sound more like a Saturday Night Live, or, in fact, MAD TV skit than an actual strategy tried out on the floor of Congress? About a week ago, the House Judiciary Committee was prepared to approve the Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act. Dem committee members offered some fairly reasonable amendments to shield some parties from criminal responsibility...For example, one amendment, offered by Rep. Bobby Scott (D-Va.), sought to exempt “cab drivers, bus drivers and others in the business transportation profession from the criminal provisions in the bill.” So, if an underage woman takes a bus to another state to have an abortion, the bus driver, who probably wouldn’t have any knowledge of the abortion, couldn’t be charged with a federal crime. Judiciary Committee Chairman James Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.) not only helped kill the amendment, he decided to rephrase it for the official record: "Mr. Scott offered an amendment that would have exempted sexual predators from...
  • Crying Wolf

    In Krugman's otherwise good article on bargaining for pharmaceuticals, he makes a really poor argument on a really important point: Needless to say, apologists for the law insist that the prohibition on price negotiations had nothing to do with catering to special interests - that it was a matter of principle, of preserving incentives to innovate. How can we refute this defense? One way is to challenge claims that the pharmaceutical industry needs high prices to innovate. In her book "The Truth About the Drug Companies," Marcia Angell, the former editor in chief of The New England Journal of Medicine, shows convincingly that drug companies spend far more on marketing than they do on research - and that much of the marketing is designed to sell "me, too" drugs, which are no better than the cheaper drugs they replace. It should be possible to pay less for medicine, yet encourage more real innovation. Sigh. That's not an important comparison, though. The drug companies are saying...
  • Now Testify!

    And DeLay's Repentance-palooza continues: "Just think of what we could accomplish if we checked our pride at the door, if collectively we all spent less time taking credit and more time deserving it," DeLay told the 54th annual National Day of Prayer gathering on Capitol Hill. "If we spent less time ducking responsibility and more time welcoming it. If we spent less time on our soapboxes and more time on our knees." DeLay drew appreciative smiles when he added, "For in God, all things are possible, ladies and gentlemen. And even greatness from lowly sinners like you and me -- especially me." Indeed it's true, greatness is quite possible from lowly sinners who trust in God. Whether your sin is a few decades of unethical politicking or a lifetime of drink and drugs, redemption can be found in The Lord. But what Tom's doing here is a bit different, he's finding redemption in The Leader. By making his wholesale invention and embrace of DeLayism into an issue of sin, he's tightly wrapping...
  • Maintenance

    Site may be down for a few minutes while Shakespeare's Sister and I perform some surgery on it. Thanks for the patience. Update : Well that did no good. Here's the deal: something's wrong with the domain. Somehow, it's still telling certain browsers -- though not all -- to access portions of the old template, resulting in a weird merge of old and new. It's not a cache problem as I've had folks clear their caches repeatedly. At the same time, it's not an html issue because the "test" site worked. So I tried importing all my archives into the test site and moving that site into this domain. The problem remained. Worse, the "old" site, which I'd moved to a different domain, no longer had any problems. That means something's happening when folks access this domain, and I have no idea what it is. If any web heads out there have a clue, I'd love to hear it. Otherwise, it's off to Typepad tech support I go. On a non-technical note, posting will remain normal, the site'll just be a little...
  • Design Stuff

    So I know we've got some problems. Shakespeare's Sister and I are going to sit down and figure it all out tonight. As it is, the posts on the site are still readable, so I'm going to keep the template as is and it'll just be a bit ugly till I fix it later. Beyond that, I know I need to: • Make the post titles bigger; • Make the miniblog's line spacing and font size smaller; • ? Anything else I could do to make the more readable and user friendly? Thanks for everybody's patience and support.