Archive

  • New Plan, Same as the Old Plan

    So the new Bush energy plan (not, to be clear, the atrocious energy bill). It's not really bad, just kinda lame. I mean, yes, we do need to break through the impasses that are keeping nuclear energy plants and liquid natural gas terminals from being built. And the hybrid car subsidy is certainly a good thing. Neither am I really against constructing a few more refineries. But for a president who prides himself on bold strokes and towering ambition, this is kid's stuff. This is pecking your date on the cheek before drinking a warm glass of milk and going to bed. This ain't, in other words, shit. The affordable oil's gonna run out, kids. Whether it's now or later, it's riding into the sunset as we speak. Bush says: "Over the past decade, our energy consumption has increased by more than 12 percent, while our domestic production has increased by less than one-half of 1 percent," he added. "It's now time to fix it." But even that overstates our abilities, Our production, after all, doesn'...
  • Dog-Blogging, and Support This Site!

    I've really been remiss in not plugging the site's first advertiser, Obey the Pure Breed . You guys should do me a favor and check the site out, it's really very funny. And in honor of the dog-theme and the Papillon section, and in expectation of you all visiting the site (preferrably through this link), I'm going to do my first-ever dog-blogging and introduce my -- or at least my family's -- papillon to the world. Behold, Pappy: That would be my girlfriend's foot, apparently delivering a kick to my poor dog's ribs. Not quite sure why she's wailing on him, but I'm sure she's got her reasons. Maybe if you visit my advertiser, she'll tell you them.
  • More on Definition

    Digby has an interesting response to my rebuttal to Kos (got all that?). Digby's point is that the Republican definition -- smaller government and lower taxes, family values, and a strong national defense -- is a stance, not a legislative agenda nor a statement of class/constituency solidarity. Instead, it lays out a set of principles as the founding blocks of conservatism. As counter, he suggests the Democrats adopt something like: "fair taxes, a secure safety net, personal privacy, civil rights, and responsible global leadership". I think he's right, and I think I was unclear. The Republican definition isn't just an agenda, it's certainly a statement of principles as well. The genius thing is that it's both -- it's what they believe in, but also what they'll (theoretically) do. That's why it works. One interesting thing about their platform is that it moves in a certain direction -- lower taxes, smaller government, stronger defense. That's why it succeeds: it not only explains what...
  • Centrism

    Julia on political centrists: This is like saying that you drive mid-size cars because you own a Civic and a Hummer. This is like saying that Michigan has a temperate climate because it's 95 in the summer and -10 in the winter. It's like saying you're a moderate drinker because you drink nothing Monday through Thursday and then have 15 pints on a Friday night. That's about right. Centrism has become a synonym for "maverick". Proving yourself a centrist isn't about moderating your opinions so much as decisively proving you don't hold the same ones as your party. Lieberman, as Julie notes, is hardly in the middle on issues: he's generally quite liberal, or quite hawkish. Which, in the current calculus, makes him some sort of a weird centrist. But the middle should mean the center of the map, not all over it. The political press, we know, is always jonesing for politicians ready to buck their parties, and that's fine. But let's pick a new word for them, one that doesn't contravene the...
  • Questions, Questions

    Bob Dole, in today's New York Times (italics mine): In the coming days, I hope changing the Senate's rules won't be necessary, but Senator Frist will be fully justified in doing so if he believes he has exhausted every effort at compromise. Of course, there is an easier solution to the impasse: Democrats can stop playing their obstruction game and let President Bush's judicial nominees receive what they are entitled to: an up-or-down vote on the floor of the world's greatest deliberative body. From the AP: Frist Say's He's Not Interested in Deals. Oh. So if he's publicly ruled out compromise, has he fully exhausted every effort at it by rejecting all compromises? Or is he simply unjustified in changing the rules?
  • Leader or President -- Circle One

    In some ways, it's hard to blame Frist for turning batshit crazy in the past few months. Unlike most senators hoping to occupy the Oval Office, the good doctor from Tennessee is majority leader, which means every overpowered, under-medicated constituency in the country is tugging at his pant leg to make him actualize their agenda in the here and now. And they mean to see him do it if he expects their support down the road. Frist has no choice but to kowtow to their demands, rejecting compromises, taking extreme positions, and generally grinding the Senate to a halt because his presidential ambitions don't allow for moderation of any sort. But this isn't restricted to Frist. This'd be the path of most any average senator elevated to the majority leader's position and harboring hopes for highest office. Running the Senate in a bipartisan, rational way is simply incompatible with the craziness and constituency-pleasing required by the presidential gauntlet. And we should know it. So if...
  • To Make 1 Definition, Mix 1 Cup Simplicity and Two Cups Specifics

    Sorry Kos , but this is a wholly useless distillation of the Democratic party: Democrats are the party for people who work for a living We're also the party of puppies, smiles, things that light up, people who do good deeds, parents who comfort their children, and those cool brown things that you wrap around a cup so you can hold your hot coffee. And that aside, I wonder what all those folks who work for a living and don't vote Democrat, or don't always vote Democrat, are going to think? And what about students, like me -- are Democrats not for me? After all the times we've shared? What changed? And who works for a living -- is that a swipe at professionals and academics, or just at heirs? Kos, and everyone else, says you can stop a person on the street, ask them what the Republican party is all about, and they'll say: smaller government and lower taxes, family values, and a strong national defense. And while I dispute that most anyone on the street could rattle off that group of...
  • I Bleg Of You

    As part of my Get a Job series, I've started having to do a lot of interviews. The problem is that I can't type fast enough to record a conversation. Some I can do online so transcription isn't an issue, but for those I can't is there some way to hook a digital recorder to my cell phone? I can't figure out how, or which ones do it (the guy at Best Buy said none of them do it), but if any of you have the technological chops to point me in the right direction, it'd make my life a lot easier.
  • Correlation is Not Causation

    Watching David Brooks and John Tierney both race to write the same column extolling the virtues of obesity and mocking liberals for denying themselves cheeseburgers was pretty funny. Did no one warn David that Tierney got there first? Does David not even read his conservative competitor? Seems that the Times token righties need to coordinate a bit better. But it was also sad to watch two supposedly powerful conservative minds use some of the most read newspaper real estate in the world to misinform their readers in the exact same way and in service on the exact same agenda. So let's get something straight: the study did not tell you to get fat. It did not tell you to get a little fat. It did not, in fact, tell you to do anything at all. We're dealing with observational data that's widely available and the authors are trying to divine a connection between weight and mortality rates from it. We're also focusing on the rate of death, rather than disability and disease (as the Times...
  • Mail Troubles

    Something glitched in my Gmail yesterday and nothing sent between in the morning and midnight got to me. Everything seems to be working now, s if you sent me anything between those times, do me a favor and resend.

Pages