Archive

  • Yes On Bolton

    Sorry, Ezra . The dream is dead : Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel said on Monday he would support John Bolton to be the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, likely clearing the way for Senate confirmation of the long-time critic of the world body. Hagel of Nebraska was the only Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee who had declined to say whether he would back Bolton, currently under secretary of state for arms control. His support removes a possible obstacle to Bolton's nomination advancing to the full Senate. I guess we're not the only ones who know there's an election coming up. And, it wasn't even the "up-or-down boilerplate" you rightly predicted: After meeting with Bolton on Monday, Hagel issued a statement of support. "His experience and knowledge will serve him well as he represents America's interests in the U.N. at a critically important time," Hagel said. Yeeeesh. - Daniel A. Munz
  • SQUEEEEEEE!

    Cheap Shot: Is it me, or is Jenna Bush dating the kid from Deliverance ? - Daniel A. Munz
  • Scientists Named Steve

    PZ Myers is going to love this one .
  • Fly Our Unfriendly Skies

    I know this is going to come as a galloping shock, but it turns out that our commercial air travel is still vulnerable to terrorism : U.S. aviation remains vulnerable to attack and groups such as al Qaeda may try to target non-commercial planes and helicopters, the New York Times reported, citing a confidential government report. The report by the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security says the aviation industry is a tempting target for acts of terrorism due to the spectacular nature of such attacks, the Times said on Monday. My first instinct here was to attack Bush. And he certainly deserves attack. He’s failed to do about a million simple things you could do to make air travel safer, such as rectifying John Kerry’s much-ballyhooed accusation that we only check about 2% of cargo containers civilians get onto aircraft, and their luggage is X-rayed, but the cargo hold is not. But then, another thought occurred to me: Of course we’re still vulnerable to terror. What else would we...
  • Don't Bless Us, We'll Bless You

    More from TNR : Gregg Easterbrook has a nice, if awkwardly premature, obituary for Pope John Paul II . I’ve always liked JP2, and the article contains some interesting facts about his life, including this: Born in 1920, Wojtyla was a university student when the Nazis invaded Poland; he joined an underground movement that kept learning alive during the Nazi darkness by holding university classes in secret and sometimes performed as an actor in plays staged in secret. I did not know that. It certainly explains his modern-seeming attitudes towards acknowledging Holocaust victims, advocating against the USSR, etc. But there was one aspect of the Pope’s modernizing influence that just leapt out at me: John Paul II moved the Church toward rationalism and reconciliation with science; he was the first pope to say that he believed Darwin’s theory of evolution. Huh. Is it me, or did this sort of coincide with religious conservatives’ attempts to inject creationism into public schools? Obviously...
  • The Hegel Factor

    I think Ezra gets it just about all right in his attempt to understand the mystery that is Chuck Hagel. As far as I can tell, Ezra thinks that Hagel’s biggest challenge will be finding a "constituency for a sober foreign policy realist." This may be true, but I think it’s part of a much bigger problem for Chuck Hagel: G.W.F. Hegel. Of course, Hegel won’t be running for president. But his shadow will be hanging all over the GOP primary. A while back, TNR’ s Jeffrey Herf explained how Condi Rice in particular, and the Bush admin in general, have adopted a troublingly Hegelian view of history : The idea that a decision cannot be judged at the moment but only retrospectively opens a slippery slope of justification. The future Secretary of State was indulging an understanding of politics favored by advocates of a Hegelian view of history—most of whom have, in the last century, been communists. … The capacity of history to absolve political actors is a cynical and immoral doctrine. No one...
  • The Times They Ain't A-Changin'

    The post Brad Plumer's trying to link to was originally on Pandagon, but since he's unearthing it for the latest round of NYT subscription stories , might as well reprint it here: I've been meaning to say a word about the reports that the New York Times might move towards online subscriptions. And the word I've been meaning to say is: bull. None of the major papers can move to subscription based reporting first. If the New York Times does it, newly-locked out infojunkies will seamlessly switch to trolling the LA Times, or the Washington Post. Aside from their columnists, the Times offers little in the way of exclusive content, and what they do offer isn't of significantly higher quality (if, indeed, it is of higher quality) than what's proffered by their competitors. To erect a wall when the same product is being distributed for free across the street just isn't smart business. As an addendum, the Times doesn't necessarily need to switch to subscriptions. I know we're supposed to...
  • Affirmative Agenda, Sure, But Still No Bill

    Garance Franke-Ruta's argument that the Democratic advantage on Social Security might be enough to save the program, but might also lose us seats if we don't take the next step forward and create a compelling narrative that protects us from the obstructionist label. I've been arguing this for awhile , but to support it with everybody's favorite historical parallel (I just read 640 pages on that goddamn fight, you better believe I'll turn to it at every opportunity), there's possibly never been so clearly-defined a party as the resurgent Republicans were during 1994. They didn't rest on the health care battle, but instead used it to inform their affirmative agenda. We need to do the same. That does not, by the way, mean pushing an alternate Social Security plan. We need to win that battle, not reengage it. Rather, we should use the capital amassed in that fight to bolster a progressive philosophy of government with the President's well-killed plans for privatization and benefit cuts...
  • DeLay in Short

    Damn that Sam Rosenfeld . Here I was planning to digest the in-depth coverage of the DeLay scandals and summarize the excellent work being done by The Stakeholder, The Daily DeLay , and Think Progress so you could all keep score at home. But he got there first . Sigh. Go read. But remember, it would've been me getting the links if not for that meddling kid...
  • Estrogen 08

    All the speculation on Rice is just weird. Is there some natural constituency for her that I'm unaware of? Even assuming support from the Black community, it's not like African-Americans swarm Republican primaries (nor find themselves particularly influential in Iowa or New Hampshire) or Dobson's group is going to warm to a "mildly pro-choice" candidate. I know the speculation is fun and all, but the woman has never campaigned in her life. She's never been elected to public office. She's never dealt with domestic issues. She seems like a perfectly competent Secretary of State, and God knows I'm glad that she's injected some sanity into the Administration's foreign policy, but it's a smidge irritating to watch her get hyped up for being a BLACK person who's WOMAN and a REPUBLICAN, as if the reason that's amazing isn't that Republicans have historically discriminated against blacks and fought the advances of feminism. There's no doubt that it'd be a real step forward for the GOP if they...

Pages