In an article today about President Lula Da Silva�s landslide (61-39) re-election victory, the Financial Times reports that the �the PT�s [Lula�s Workers Party] anti-liberal rhetoric during the second round has caused consternation among many economists, who see it as a sign that spending cuts, needed to release money for investment and growth, are less likely under a second Lula administration than the first.� This continues a major theme of the Financial Times� pre-election coverage.
A bigger worry for economists concerned about Brazil�s sluggish growth (1.4 percent average annual per capita for Lula�s four years, about the same as for his predecessor Fernando Henrique Cardoso�s 1.6 percent for 8 years) would be Brazil�s interest rates. The Selic (central bank overnight rate, comparable to our Fed�s 5.25 percent federal funds rate) rate is currently at 13.75 percent. Brazil�s inflation is now less than ours; hence the country�s real interest rates are among the highest in the world. These exorbitant interest rates also contribute to the overvaluation of Brazil�s currency, which has appreciated about 54 percent during Lula�s first term, and makes it difficult for Brazil�s industrial sector to compete at home or abroad. (For more detail click here).
In fact, for those economists worried about cutting the Brazilian government�s spending, lowering interest rates may be the fastest and most politically feasible means to that end: the government currently spends an enormous 7.9 percent of GDP for interest payments on the public debt (the equivalent of more than $1 trillion a year in the United States), and 47 percent of the debt has its interest rate tied to the central bank�s Selic rate.
It is encouraging that the international press is finally beginning to notice the unprecedented long-term growth failure that is Brazil�s most important economic problem: over the last 25 years it has grown only 11 percent per capita, as compared to 123 percent from just 1960-1980. But it�s not likely that continuing the same economic policies of the last 25 years, along with some budget cuts, will reverse this failure.
You need to be logged in to comment.
(If there's one thing we know about comment trolls, it's that they're lazy)