More than two years ago, two parolees allegedly broke into a Cheshire, Connecticut, home and brutally murdered the family inside; only the father survived. Among the many efforts afterward to address the crime, Connecticut's General Assembly
Then, last month, when I was still a reporter in Connecticut, I ended up
It's likely the charges will be reduced as the result of a plea bargain, because most criminal cases are resolved that way. And I doubt anyone would want the teens to go to jail for 10 years. I'm not trying to minimize the wrongness of what they allegedly did. I'm just not sure what the intent of the law is. There already is a statute that defines entering a home with the intent to commit a crime; it's called burglary. The difference is the home doesn't have to be occupied. But even if someone breaks into a home to commit as heinous a crime as the Cheshire parolees are alleged to have done, they will already face severe penalties if convicted of the crimes of murder and rape. Maybe lawmakers imagined a scenario in which prosecutors could prove suspects entered a home but couldn't prove the subsequent crimes committed once inside. In the meantime, you've got teenagers staring at 10 years. Even if they don't get it, that's where the bargaining position starts.
You may also like:
You need to be logged in to comment.
(If there's one thing we know about comment trolls, it's that they're lazy)