Before the holidays, I wrote a column, "Don't Fear the Fiscal Reapers," arguing that a commission to address the long-term fiscal crisis need not be the disaster that many progressives fear -- an excuse for massive cuts in Social Security and Medicare -- but could actually do some good, including providing cover for the increases in revenues that we desperately need.
The article drew a letter to the editor from David Walker, the former U.S. comptroller general who now runs the Peter G. Peterson Foundation, one of the principal advocates for such a commission. It didn't seem that Walker was disagreeing with anything in the article, but was concerned that it "might be misinterpreted" to suggest that the Peterson Foundation places a priority on cuts in entitlement spending. To the contrary, Walker says, everything has to be "on the table," including "more revenues."
As I noted in the article, this is an important shift in tone and priority for the deficit-hawks, and further reason that progressives should not see calls for a commission as simply Social Security-bashing by another name. The full letter is below.
You may also like
You need to be logged in to comment.
(If there's one thing we know about comment trolls, it's that they're lazy)