A SPLIT IN THE ANTI-ABORTION MOVEMENT? I recently stumbled across this item from the Christian press in which prominent anti-choicer Leslee Unruh admits that during the South Dakota abortion ban campaign she faced more harassment from hardline "pro-lifers" than from pro-choicers.
"When you�re running a pro-life campaign the last thing you need is pro-lifers who have a different strategy and won�t respect the people in the state," Unruh said. [...] "When someone works as hard as I have for 22 years, the outside pro-lifers coming in and bringing trucks and (bringing) anger and hate�that affects the community."
All of the tactics that "scared" Unruh -- gory photos of dismembered fetuses, disruptive prayer vigils, videotaping reporters and volunteers -- are classic moves by anti-abortion groups. Maybe she should be asking pro-choicers for some advice. We've got a lot of experience dealing with that sort of harassment.
This is yet another sign that Unruh's brand of anti-choice/"pro-woman" framing could divide the anti-abortion movement -- separating the savvier types (see also: Feminists for Life) from those who prefer to wail, "Don't kill the baaaaabies!". I agree with Sarah Blustain and Reva Siegel that the antis who falsely fly the "pro-woman" flag make for more formidable adversaries, so their rising prominence is troubling. But the challenge they pose to the more traditional, fetus-focused activists could make the anti-choicers compete within their movement for resources and political support, which would work in pro-choicers' favor. I'll be curious to see how it shakes out.
You may also like
You need to be logged in to comment.
(If there's one thing we know about comment trolls, it's that they're lazy)