Skip to main content

Home

Login or Register

Donate

  • Follow @theprospect
  •  
  • Newsletters
  • RSS
  • Home
  • Politics
    • Economy
    • Energy & Environment
    • Gender & Sexuality
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Labor
    • Science & Technology
    • World
  • Culture
    • Books
    • Film
    • Television
  • Blogs
    • Vox Pop
    • Policy Shop
  • Voices
    • Jamelle Bouie
    • E.J. Graff
    • Robert Kuttner
    • Harold Meyerson
    • Abby Rapoport
    • Robert Reich
    • Paul Waldman
    • Other Contributors ⇒
  • Magazine

Search form

RSS

Paul Starr

Paul Starr is co-editor of the The American Prospect. His most recent book is Remedy and Reaction: The Peculiar American Struggle over Health Care Reform. Click here to read more about Starr.

Recent Articles

How Low Can You Go?

Paul StarrDec 19, 2001

HAPPINESS IS . . .

According to The Economist, PaineWebber has created an
index of "happiness" for bonds that goes up when unemployment
rises.

If others would only follow this example and strike a blow against
hypocrisy, we could have a series of more accurate social indicators:
an index of happiness for hospitals that jumps when epidemics
hit; one for journalists that goes up when scandals break out;
another for lawyers and accountants that climbs whenever a company
goes bankrupt.

  • Read more about How Low Can You Go?
  • See the complete issue
PinItInstapaperPocketEmailPrint

America's Parliamentary Election

Paul StarrDec 19, 2001

The 2000 presidential election, we've all heard, is "front loaded" because early primaries are likely to decide the nominations, and candidates consequently have had to accumulate money and support long in advance. But this past year, the race became front loaded in another way- many people were already bored when it had scarcely begun. Very early in the process, the conventional wisdom settled on who the nominees and even the winner would be. And with the economy growing smartly and no single issue galvanizing public opinion, the prospect that both major parties would nominate bland centrists led many people to conclude that however the political battle turned out, it wouldn't make much difference.

  • Read more about America's Parliamentary Election
  • See the complete issue
PinItInstapaperPocketEmailPrint

Of Our Time: The Clinton Presidency, Take Three

Paul StarrDec 19, 2001

Bill Clinton's first term effectively lasted two years, until the disastrous midterm elections of 1994. Then came the two-year Clinton-Gingrich government of national disharmony, ending in the President's miraculous revival. Now we have the third Clinton presidency, the second Gingrich Congress, and a gathering storm of investigations that may well dominate national politics for the next two years.

  • Read more about Of Our Time: The Clinton Presidency, Take Three
  • See the complete issue
PinItInstapaperPocketEmailPrint

How Low Can You Go?

Paul StarrDec 19, 2001

SENSE AND SENSATIONALISM

Throughout the scandals of recent years, the public has seemed
a lot more sober than the reporters. Take the Dick Morris affair.
You have to work yourself into a state of extreme delusionary
rectitude to be shocked by a relationship between a political
consultant and a prostitute. Indeed, when I first heard that Morris
had been caught with a prostitute, I thought he might just have
been by himself.

  • Read more about How Low Can You Go?
  • See the complete issue
PinItInstapaperPocketEmailPrint

Rights under the Knife

Paul StarrDec 19, 2001

The Congress that made the impeachment of President Clinton its first item of business is now approaching its end with little to brag about. During the impeachment, I disagreed with liberals who thought the proceedings were an unmitigated disaster. Anything that distracted this Congress from actually passing legislation seemed to me worth public encouragement. Yet even after the impeachment frenzy was over, the danger of serious congressional accomplishment turned out to be minimal. The Republicans themselves have been too divided to get much done; as the saying goes, the right hand doesn't know what the far right hand is doing.

  • Read more about Rights under the Knife
  • See the complete issue
PinItInstapaperPocketEmailPrint

Pages

  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • …
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • …
  • next ›
  • last »

© by The American Prospect

  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Jobs/Internships
  • Masthead
  • Submissions
  • Reprints
  • Privacy Policy
  • Archive
  • Customer Service