Paul Waldman

Paul Waldman is the Prospect's daily blogger, and a contributing editor. He also blogs for the Plum Line at the Washington Post, and is the author of Being Right is Not Enough: What Progressives Must Learn From Conservative Success.

Recent Articles

Leave Mitt Romney Alone!

Mitt Romney has a problem, which is that the portrait about him has already been written. Not only that, it's the kind that can't really be proved wrong. Let's say you're Sarah Palin , and part of the portrait about you is that you're an utter ignoramus when it comes to things like policy, or things like ... well, anything really. You could hit the trail and prove people wrong by showing yourself to actually be remarkably well informed and insightful. Not that you will, but you could. And over time, some might decide that maybe you're not so dumb after all. But if the portrait of you says that you're an opportunistic phony who's willing to switch positions at a moment's notice, you get virtually no credit for having the same position you've always had on some things. You can't say, "Look at me, I didn't pander or flip-flop today -- don't you think you were wrong about me?" Not only that, people may accuse you of flip-flopping even when you're not. Worst of all, you'll watch your...

Defending a Constitution Under Attack

Shahid Buttar, a civil-rights lawyer and executive director of the Bill of Rights Defense Committee, talks about recent constitutional flare-ups.

Shahid Buttar (Courtesy of the Bill of Rights Defense Committee)
With the First, Fourth, Fifth, 14th, and 17th amendments all coming under attack from one quarter or another, there's recently been a renewed focus on civil liberties. TAP spoke with Shahid Buttar, a civil-rights lawyer and executive director of the Bill of Rights Defense Committee, as well as a poet and singer, about the administration's record on these issues, what the FBI is up to, and even the state of music and politics. A lot of people on the left were hoping that Barack Obama would wipe away everything George W. Bush had done to restrict civil liberties. Obviously, that hasn't happened. But what would you say is the best thing the Obama administration has done in this area, and the most glaring omission in its policies? I'd say the single best thing the president has done in this arena is to renounce extraordinary/coercive interrogation. Ending torture is a big deal, period. Having said that, the failure to impose accountability has invited more torture in the future by eroding...

More GOP Liberalization.

That former Republican Party chairman and manager of George W. Bush 's re-election campaign Ken Mehlman revealed that he is gay isn't a surprise; as many have noted, Mehlman's identity was widely known in Washington for some time. But what may be surprising is that the response from Republicans has been rather muted. The response from Ed Gillespie, another former chairman seems typical: Yeah, we know, but we're still opposed to gay marriage. It all reminded me of a column I wrote two years ago, on the occasion of Larry Craig 's unfortunate encounter with the police in a bathroom in the Minneapolis airport: The Republican Party of which Craig was such an honored member can abide many things -- dishonesty, incompetence, corruption, even a taste for prostitutes. All manner of sins can be forgiven, so long as the sinner proclaims his fealty to the cause. But there are some lines that may not be crossed. Over the last few years they have invested so deeply in anti-gay bigotry that they had...

The GOP Finding Its Voice on Foreign Policy.

Greg Sargent argues that with the controversy over the Cordoba House, "the Cheney-ites are winning the battle over the future direction of GOP foreign policy." If it's true, it shouldn't be too surprising. Within a complex party, particular issues are often ceded to the group that cares about them the most. And apart from a Likudnik approach to the Middle East, which is now practically universal on the right, lots of Republicans don't have much to say about foreign policy. If you had to describe the prevailing GOP approach to foreign affairs, what would you say? It's hard to know, even with regard to some places where we're rather heavily engaged. What's the Republican position on Afghanistan? On the future of our relationship with China? The easiest thing to fall back on is the division of the world into good guys and bad guys, which may get you to a Palinesque level of understanding, but it doesn't give much guidance as to what the country should do . For instance, Mahmoud...

A Tea Party Backlash Within the GOP?

Is the Tea Party the new religious right? By which I mean, the grassroots group the GOP uses to mobilize voters, then once in office, keeps serving up symbolic expressions of love without much to show in the way of actual policy goodies, while hoping to keep the crazies under wraps. The fact is that the Republican establishment has always been a bit uncomfortable with the religious right, as much as they need them to win elections. And that establishment may become increasingly unsettled with the Tea Party. In today's Washington Post , Michael Gerson , former speechwriter for George W. Bush , unloads on the Tea Party, in terms its members will no doubt find elitist: "In the normal course of events, political movements begin as intellectual arguments, often conducted for years in serious books and journals. To study the Tea Party movement, future scholars will sift through the collected tweets of Sarah Palin ." Oh, snap! He also criticizes them for not understanding the history they...

Pages