Paul Waldman

Paul Waldman is the Prospect's daily blogger, and a contributing editor. He also blogs for the Plum Line at the Washington Post, and is the author of Being Right is Not Enough: What Progressives Must Learn From Conservative Success.

Recent Articles

The Audacity Gap Continues.

There are some political problems that can be solved with a shift in strategy or rhetoric -- for instance, after Scott Brown 's surprise victory in the Massachusetts special election, Democrats realized they were being damaged by the perception that they were a bunch of ineffectual cowards, so they stopped acting cowardly and actually passed health-care reform. It didn't turn everything to roses, but it gave them a chance to minimize their political losses this fall. But there are some problems that have no simple solution. One of these is what I call the audacity gap in American politics, the fact that there are certain things Republicans are quite happy to do that Democrats won't. A lot of it has to do with how brazenly disingenuous they're willing to be. For instance, Republicans don't like the idea of tougher regulations on banks, so they huddle with their patrons in the banking industry, then emerge and announce that they oppose this reform because ... it's a bailout for those...

Fight the Power, Except Not.

Untitled from elizabeth glover on Vimeo . Via Andrew Sullivan , we see the predominantly 50+ Tea Partiers uncomfortably encounter that hippity-hoppity music all the kids listen to these days. They are unmoved. One note to the performers: All those elected officials you don't like? They're your representatives. You have representation. I know "taxation without representation" allows you to rhyme "the Tea Party movement is sweeping the nation," but you might as well be rapping against the the next King of England being determined via primogeniture. Because that doesn't apply to our country either. --Paul Waldman

Policing the Boundaries of Morality.

A number of people have noted that after a weird outbreak of at least tentative reasonableness, Focus on the Family reversed itself this week and declared that no, they would absolutely not be open to the idea of a gay person on the Supreme Court, no matter how otherwise sane such a person might seem. The bigotry we've come to expect, but there's something else notable about the statement the group issued: We can assure you that we recognize that homosexual behavior is a sin and does not reflect God's created intent and desire for humanity. Further, we at Focus do affirm that character and moral rectitude should be key considerations in appointing members of the judiciary, especially in the case of the highest court in the land. Sexual behavior — be it heterosexual or homosexual — certainly lies at the heart of personal morality. Sexual behavior -- i.e., engaging only in a very specific set of allowable sexual activities, namely heterosexual sex between married men and women -- "lies...

Three Cheers for Tax Day!

Around this time every year, people start making all kinds of ideologically motivated claims about taxes. So I thought it might be worthwhile to diffuse a few myths. Let's get right to it: We're taxed to death! Well, no. In fact, when you look at American tax rates compared to those of other countries, we have extremely low taxes. This graph, using data from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development , shows that among industrialized countries, we rank near the bottom in taxes paid. It's a little hard to see, but the U.S. is over there on the right, with only the Japanese, Turkish, and Mexicans paying less in taxes than us: But the hard-working rich are paying all the taxes! Again, no. The rich pay much more in federal income taxes , which are actually progressive. But federal income taxes are only one of the many taxes we pay. Add in payroll taxes, sales taxes, excise taxes, and property taxes, and you get a very different picture, one in which the poor pay a little...

Today's Installment of Obama Tyranny

In today's Washington Post , Dana Milbank devotes a column to complaining that at the Nuclear Security Summit, President Obama "put on a clinic for some of the world's greatest dictators in how to circumvent a free press." The problem, it seems was that there weren't enough sessions open to the media, so they could assemble quotes for their stories. In other words, Milbank (and he no doubt speaks for some other reporters as well) wants more theater. No one would claim that a session in which a number of the leaders talked with each other in front of the cameras would be anything else -- but it would make it a lot easier to write a story about the summit. You could go to the event, take down what everyone said, and write your story. Either way, the real work would be done when the cameras are off. But without that event, reporters are going to have to work harder -- and maybe spend more time on the substance of the issue. Not that you'll get that from Milbank in any case -- you're as...