Robert B. Reich, a co-founder of The American Prospect, is a Professor of Public Policy at the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. His website can be found here and his blog can be found here.
I f they were true profit-maximizers--textbook illustrations of rational self-interest--American corporations and their top executives would be flooding Al Gore's campaign with money, and not George W.'s. Rather than gamble on an unknown W., they'd bet on a proven Al Gore.
No administration in modern history has been as good for American business as has the Clinton-Gore team; none has been as solicitous of the concerns of business leaders, generated as much profit for business, presided over as buoyant a stock market or as huge a run-up in executive pay. And no vice president in modern history has had as much influence in setting an administration's agenda as has Al Gore.
Consider fiscal policy. You'll recall that by 1992, after 12 years of Republicans in the White House, the nation's debt had almost quadrupled, from $914 billion to $4 trillion, and yearly deficits had quintupled from $59 billion to more than $300...
Any time now, government economists will decide whether America Online's (AOL's) $165-billion proposed take-over of Time Warner is likely to be good or bad for consumers. If good, the government will sign off. If bad, there'll be negotiations with AOL and Time Warner until an agreement can be reached on what the new company would have to do to answer economic objections. The inquiry will be quiet and businesslike, occurring in colorless offices and occasionally in meeting rooms filled not only with economists but also with government lawyers and the counsel and investment bankers representing AOL and Time Warner.
I'll save all those economists and lawyers and bankers a lot of time and trouble, and answer their questions right here:
Is the combination efficient? Yes. AOL serves about 20 million Internet subscribers. Time Warner serves 13 million cable subscribers and also has a lot of content--magazines, movie and music studios, and...
D ot-com billionaires are sprouting like spring crocuses, and their money is trickling down through the rich topsoil of America. The average pay of chief executives of major companies rose 18 percent in 1999, to $12 million. (Back in 1990, it was a modest $1.8 million.) Fearful of the dot-com brain drain, big law firms just hiked the pay of first-year associates to $120,000, not including signing bonuses. Wall Street investment banks, facing the same threat, are even raising the pay of analysts just out of college, to more than $75,000. The frenzy knows no bounds. Setting a new moral example for college students across America, the president of Brown University, not content with a meager $300,000 salary, just jumped ship after only a year and a half for another university that offered three times as much. Fed chief Alan Greenspan fears that all this prosperity is causing consumers to buy more than the economy can produce, which means that inflation is just around the corner. So...
This week I got three letters from credit companies, all wanting me to sign up. One of them
congratulated me on having been "selected" for a credit line of up to $5,000. Another
commended me for being one of its most "valued" patrons and offered me a "low
introductory" interest rate plus a free cell phone. The third assured me that my "financial
needs would be taken care of." It also promised me extra frequent-flier miles if I signed up
I was flattered by all of the attention. Then I did some research. Last year, credit card
companies sent out almost 4 billion solicitations - the equivalent of 16 letters to every man,
woman and child in the United States. If you could breathe, you probably received one. If
you could write your name, you got 12. I even found a dog that got one.
Credit card issuers aren't overly worried about whether the people they're soliciting are
good credit risks. People...
The biggest threat to America's booming IT sector is a severe shortage of
skilled people. Some estimates put the current shortfall at 400,000. What's
to be done?
In most industries facing such shortages, salary levels rise until enough
people are attracted to fill the need. Supply responds to demand.
But, as you'll see in Computerworld's 13th Annual Salary Survey ("Return
to Sanity,"), salaries in the corporate IT sector have been rising no faster
than in most other parts of the economy. There's no beating the free
market: If the IT sector wants more skilled people, it is going to have to
pay for them.
And salaries don't even tell the whole story. IT jobs are becoming less
secure. The half-life of a software engineer is coming to resemble that of a
professional athlete. One recent survey shows that six years after getting
their computer science degrees, 60% of graduates are...