Skip to main content

Home

Login or Register

Donate

  • Follow @theprospect
  •  
  • Newsletters
  • RSS
  • Home
  • Politics
    • Economy
    • Energy & Environment
    • Gender & Sexuality
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Labor
    • Science & Technology
    • World
  • Culture
    • Books
    • Film
    • Television
  • Blogs
    • Vox Pop
    • Policy Shop
  • Voices
    • Jamelle Bouie
    • E.J. Graff
    • Robert Kuttner
    • Harold Meyerson
    • Abby Rapoport
    • Robert Reich
    • Paul Waldman
    • Other Contributors ⇒
  • Magazine

Search form

RSS

Stephen Teles

Steven M. Teles is assistant professor of politics at Brandeis University and author of Whose Welfare? AFDC and Elite Politics.

Recent Articles

On the Politics of Virtue

Stephen TelesDec 19, 2001



THE LIBERAL VIRTUES

Stephen Teles

The
welfare state and the advocates of "virtue" have few friends
in common. Those on the right want to save virtue from the welfare state,
while those on the left want to protect the welfare state from the rhetoric
of virtue. An exemplar of the latter tendency is James Morone's "The
Corrosive Politics of Virtue" (May-June 1996).

  • Read more about On the Politics of Virtue
  • See the complete issue
PinItInstapaperPocketEmailPrint

Escape from America's Prison Policy

Stephen TelesDec 19, 2001


  • Read more about Escape from America's Prison Policy
  • See the complete issue
PinItInstapaperPocketEmailPrint

Can new Labour Dance the Clinton?

Stephen TelesDec 19, 2001

  • Read more about Can new Labour Dance the Clinton?
  • See the complete issue
PinItInstapaperPocketEmailPrint

No Deal:

Stephen TelesDec 19, 2001


So it has come down to this: The chief executive of the most powerful nation
in the world will be determined by nine Supreme Court Justices' interpretation of the Electoral Count Act of 1887. As I write, it is hard to tell how the Court will decide, but one thing is clear -- the injection of the Supreme Court into this process is the final absurdity in the nation's fruitless attempt to solve an essentially political conflict by legal means. There is no reason to assume that the Supreme Court will succeed where lower courts have, as yet, failed.

  • Read more about No Deal:
PinItInstapaperPocketEmailPrint

© by The American Prospect

  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Jobs/Internships
  • Masthead
  • Submissions
  • Reprints
  • Privacy Policy
  • Archive
  • Customer Service