TAPPED

THE BOMBTHROWERS' LEARNING...

THE BOMBTHROWERS' LEARNING CURVE. One more brief thing on Amy Sullivan's piece. On the question of Gingrich-style bomb-throwing and oppositional PR tactics, Amy emphasizes the degree to which Democrats have improved in the last year without getting much credit for it. While I'm on record calling out the Democrats for some residual lameness on the ethics fight specifically, there's no question that this improvement is real, and is hardly ever remarked upon. Major scandal stories erupt without anyone crediting Democratic bomb-throwers for instigating them.

THE BIG STORY:...

THE BIG STORY: STILL WAITING TO BE TOLD. Before this point gets lost in the din of the latest leak disclosures, it needs to be said, as loudly as possible, that the big story has yet to be told, and in that regard, Murray Waas's previous scoop about Karl Rove is even more important -- and more deserving of mainstream media attention -- in light of the new revelations.

JUST POSTED ON...

JUST POSTED ON TAP: IF THEY HAD A HAMMER. Terence Samuel thinks the Democrats could stand to learn a thing or two from Tom DeLay.

So now�s that moment, at the end of the fund-drive, where the hosts say you only have five more minutes to join. That�s not entirely true in our case, but still, please subscribe. This is the last you�ll hear about subscriptions for at least a few months.

--The Editors

PODHORETZ FLOATS FLIMSY...

PODHORETZ FLOATS FLIMSY RIGHT-WING PUSHBACK ON LEAK STORY -- AND PUNTS. The emerging right-wing spin about the leak revelations was perfectly captured in John Podhoretz's column today in the New York Post. Since these arguments are certain to be aired again and again in coming days, they need to be debunked, and quickly. And it's remarkably easy to do.

The Pod makes three points, all of which are soon to be chanted in unison by countless winger commentators. He says:

1) The leak wasn't really a leak because it was authorized by the president, and a "leak" is the "unauthorized release of government information."

THE IMPORTANT QUESTIONS....

THE IMPORTANT QUESTIONS. If you ask me, the real problem with the Anna Nicole Smith nipple cover is that it doesn't show enough skin. If you look at Eugene Delacroix's original, Liberty Leading the People, the entire right breast is exposed along with a considerable portion of the left.

--Matthew Yglesias

A FEATURE, NOT...

A FEATURE, NOT A BUG. Michael Tanner, Cato's health policy director, is not happy (PDF) about the Massachusetts plan:

DEMOCRATIC "DISARRAY" --...

DEMOCRATIC "DISARRAY" -- COMPARED TO WHAT? I'll join with others in strongly recommending Amy Sullivan's bracingly counter-intuitive argument that the Democrats don't actually suck. Amy is very right here. Much of her focus is on the mainstream media narratives that continue to portray Democrats as invariably weak, divided, and feckless. But MSM cluelessness is an old story -- what's frankly more troubling and frustrating is the unyielding scorn and hostility that Democratic activists and netroots folks heap on the Democratic congressional leadership.

CHANGES AT THE...

CHANGES AT THE NEW REPUBLIC. Can I just say, as a twenty-something male, that I'm quite pleased with TNR's transformation under the leadership of Frank Foer? Last week, not only did I have a piece in the magazine, but the cover featured an Anna Nicole Smith nipple slip. This week, we get a stylized Paris Hilton look alike. Counterintuitive wonkery never looked so good. Except at The American Prospect, of course, which you should subscribe to lest you miss our upcoming "Men Of The Economic Left" cheesecake calendar. I hear we're going to make Fast Leon don a thong...

--Ezra Klein

DING-DONG, THE BILL...

DING-DONG, THE BILL IS DEAD. Looks like the immigration "compromise" is dead in the water. Good. Democrats and a handful of Republicans blocked the GOP's efforts to amend the legislation into an unrecognizable mess by a 60-38 vote, and now the whole thing's off the table. Just more evidence for Amy Sullivan's contention that the post-2004 Democratic minority is an effective opposition force that has seen far more victories than defeats.

SUCH SUBTLETY, SUCH...

SUCH SUBTLETY, SUCH NUANCE. As Greg Sargent notices, a leak is a leak is a leak, except when the leaker is the president. But in some ways, the more interesting wrinkle of this little saga is the ways a lie isn't a lie when the administration utters it. As others have noticed in the past, this crew deceives, misleads, and insinuates, but they rarely, rarely, lie. Take Bush's famous statement from the investigation's early days:

PHILOSOPHICAL CLEAN-UP. Tom...

PHILOSOPHICAL CLEAN-UP. Tom Friedman says the Bush administration "tried to make history on the cheap. But you can't will the ends without willing the means. That is Strategic Theory 101, and ignoring it is not just some 'tactical error.'" It's not Strategic Theory 101, it's Philosophy 101 (or, in my case, Philosophy 168) -- Friedman's quoting Immanuel Kant here, not a military strategist.

A LEAK ISN'T...

A LEAK ISN'T REALLY A LEAK. GOT THAT? The White House appears to have adopted a novel approach to spinning their way out of yesterday's explosive revelations about Scooter Libby's testimony that President Bush authorized the leaking of classified intelligence. From today's Washington Post:

CAN'T WIN IF...

CAN'T WIN IF YOU DON'T DISAGREE. I'm sensitive to concerns that there are some districts out there where a robust anti-war stance would create problems for Democrats in the fall. On the other hand, as this story indicates there are some GOP incumbents -- like Chris Shays -- for whom the war is their major vulnerability. But you can't take full advantage of that weakness unless you're really prepared to differentiate yourself with an anti-war message.

MAN...They're biting my...

MAN...They're biting my style, yo. Show 'em what's what and subscribe here, instead.

--Ezra Klein

MOVING THE DEBATE...

MOVING THE DEBATE LEFTWARD. And this, via Jon Cohn, is why I'm enthusiastic about Mitt Romney's presidential candidacy:

Still, Mitt Romney will say this law makes him a worthy candidate for the Republican presidential nomination. And he's right. Politics should reward officials who accomplish something in office. And while it will undoubtedly annoy some progressives who don't love the plan or think he's taking credit for an idea (and favorable circumstances) that fell into his lap, they should be thankful for this development.

Pages