The Race-Baiting Continues

I've been holding off on writing something about the bizarre spectacle of the Derrick Bell "exposé" that has consumed the nuttier corners of the right in the last couple of days, simply because it's so weird and pathetic that I wasn't sure exactly how to talk about it beyond simple ridicule. In case you missed it, here's the story, briefly: Just before he died, conservative provocateur Andrew Breitbart said his web enterprises would soon release an explosive video that would transform the 2012 election by revealing Barack Obama's radical ties. The video turned out to be of something that was not only utterly unremarkable, but had been reported before. In 1991, when Obama was a student at Harvard Law School, the school was embroiled in a controversy over the under-representation of minorities on the faculty. Derrick Bell, the first black tenured professor at the school and a widely admired figure in legal circles, announced that he would take a leave until the school made efforts to hire more minority faculty. Obama spoke at a rally in support of Bell, and in support of more minorities on the faculty. And that's the shocking revelation. Oh, and one more thing that conservatives are up in arms about—they hugged. Really.

Over at Breitbart's web site, I count eight separate pieces on Derrick Bell (who died last year), trying to make the case that he was some kind of insane radical pushing radical theories of radicalism, all with the intention of oppressing white people, which is obviously what Barack Obama is up to as well. Just to get a flavor, here's an excerpt from one of the articles:

Racialism is so woven into the thinking of Bell, and many believe Barack Obama, any white individual, regardless of ideology or personal attribute lacks the ability to understand and relate racism in America. Consequently, the notion of racial quotas is not simply based upon some idea of equality of opportunity, they must be imposed as white's [sic] are inferior to blacks in an area Bell and Obama see as critical. While we like to think of equality as color blind, that is not the view Bell shared as a "truth" Obama embraced and encouraged others to do, as well.

You'll notice the chain of logic, though I use that term loosely: Here's an exaggeration of something Derrick Bell once said, "many believe" Obama thinks in the same way, here's a leap to a parody of policies Obama doesn't actually support, here's a conclusion about how Obama hates white people and wants to screw them.

From the beginning of Breitbart's enterprise, race-baiting was a key element of his attack on Barack Obama, one that continues even after his death. And he always had plenty of company, from Glenn Beck saying Obama "has a deep-seated hatred of white people," to Rush Limbaugh's repeated insistence to his white listeners that Obama was motivated by racial hatred in everything he did. "Obama's entire economic program is reparations," Limbaugh proclaimed. "The days of [minorities] not having any power are over, and they are angry," he said. "And they want to use their power as a means of retribution. That's what Obama's about, gang." When in 2009 he found a story about a white kid getting beaten up by a black kid on a school bus, Limbaugh said, "In Obama's America, the white kids now get beat up with the black kids cheering, 'Yay, right on, right on, right on, right on.'" And yes, he did that last part in an exaggerated "black" accent.

The message is always the same: Obama and the blacks are mad, and they're coming for you. Yet people like the Breitbart folks and Limbaugh have two problems. First, they're running out of material. There aren't any more shocking revelations to be had. The best they can do is try to make mountains of racial resentment out of the most innocuous molehills, like the fact that Obama supported Derrick Bell's effort to diversify the faculty when he was a law student. And second, by now anyone who can be convinced that Obama is a secret Black Panther never thought otherwise. The guy has been president for three years. Americans are pretty familiar with him. He hasn't actually started herding white people into concentration camps, and it's an awfully tough sell to tell people that he might any day now.

This is a version of the larger problem conservatives have as we get into the 2012 election. The argument many of them will be making, in various forms, is this: Forget about what Obama has actually done. That doesn't tell you anything. Let me tell you a story about his secret desires, his wicked thoughts, his venomous heart. That's what your decision should be based on. You hear it from media bloviators, you hear it from interest groups, like the NRA screeching that if he's re-elected Obama will outlaw guns, and you hear it from Mitt Romney, who is forever claiming that deep down Obama doesn't much love America and wants to turn it into a European-style social-welfare state. Who are you going to believe, them, me, or or your own eyes?

Watching this stuff is immensely dispiriting, I'll grant you. But it should be some consolation that it doesn't seem to be working.


So: "Basketball" is a dog-whistle term, but quoting a black guy talking about "white boys" is race-baiting.

Man. I'm glad I don't live on THAT planet.

I re-read Paul Waldman's editorial and did not see 'basketball' or 'white boys' used at all. So any comments that don't affirm or deny what Waldman wrote must indicate a problem with reading comprehension or were intended for another op-ed and was mistakenly posted, I have to assume.

Mr. Waldman, I don't find the effort to incite racial division as dispiriting as you do. I've observed the same incitement by the Republican Party throughout my life at every presidential election since 1968, right after LBJ marshalled Congressional support to get the Civil Rights Act and Voting Rights Act passed. In most of those elections, it was necessary to try and keep the South voting as a Republican bloc. Without it, there was no other path to victory.

At 3 years and 7 weeks, Obama is now the longest serving Democratic president who hails from north of the Mason-Dixon line in 67 years (since FDR). Couple that with the first 76 years between George Washington's election and the Thirteenth Amendment that abolished slavery, and that's 143 years that racial bigotry was an issue in presidential elections, out of the 223 years that the country's had presidents. And in reality, it's been at issue in more elections than that, as the nation wound through the Jim Crow era, right up through the 1948 election, after Truman desegregated the armed forces.

Both parties and other parties have played this race card for nearly all of our electoral history, but the card has been owned by the GOP alone since the 1968 election. In 2008, the effectiveness of that card was finally broken as parts of the South voted for a northern Democrat who also was black.

In short, the GOP strategy is clutching onto the last remnants of a card that's no longer a guarantee, because our country, as a whole, has grown to be more racially tolerant. I would be far more dispirited if the GOP was trying fresh ideas to counter Democratic party policies. Dividing the country via the hateful, oft-deadly race card is a strategy of people who lack the imagination to try something constructive, uniting or new.

Welcome back from Mars, Mr. Hayden.

Yea...nothing to see here...right! haha...try some real journalism...

If one wants to understand the difference in the intellectual acumen between the right and the left, just compare Mr. Hayden's reasoned comment with the pathetic trolling coming from our right wing guests. I look forward to the Republicans continuing to run on their dual platforms of "women who use birth control are sluts" and "Barack Obama is BLAAAAAAACK!" Should be a real winner in November. The fact that these folks consider a video (one that has been available online in its entirety for years) of the future President hugging a civil rights activist and Havard professor two decades ago to be scandalous speaks volumes. Fortunately, no one north of the Mason Dixon line or a GED has any interest in their sad little Kabuki theater.

You should probably get even more upset.

Jim, Thanks for providing more evidence of my point. Since more refined arguments don't seem to resonate with you, let me use a cultural reference I'm sure you can relate to. Brietbart should have heeded Dean Wormer's advice: "Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life." Come to think of it, it has been a rough couple of weeks for overweight, substance-addled, race baiting clowns.

You need to be logged in to comment.
(If there's one thing we know about comment trolls, it's that they're lazy)