Why the Chicago Teachers Won

(AP Photo/Chicago Sun-Times, Brian Jackson)

Chicago Teachers Union President Karen Lewis speaks at a rally at Daley Plaza in Chicago.

Consider the battle of Chicago’s teachers as a lesson for what’s ahead as the same struggle winds its way away around the nation.

For the nation’s beleaguered labor movement, the six-day strike by the Chicago Teachers Union that ended on Tuesday is proof that a strike is not suicide, as has been the fate lately for most unions.

Indeed, as the end neared and they were heady with an apparent win, the teachers’ talk catapulted from standing up for teachers to standing up for organized labor and ultimately to speaking for bullied, and exploited workers.

In the build up to the dispute, it didn’t seem likely that the union would be able to walk away. Not after the Illinois legislature required the union to win a strike vote by 75 percent of its members, and not after Mayor Rahm Emanuel fearlessly carried out a number of steps that only riled up the union. But it did, with the three-year deal that its 26,000 teachers will soon vote on.

The union played its cards well. It honed an internal campaign that produced a 90 percent strike vote and kept its rank-and-file largely solidified until the end, when fired-up union members balked briefly at okaying the deal without mulling it over in detail.  

At the same time the union delivered a message to the public that tamped down any serious or loud protests from parents and community groups. The anti-strike campaign waged by Emanuel’s allies and assorted foes of teachers’ unions surprisingly gained little traction.

Does this mean that others will get similar results if they carefully copy and paste the Chicago teachers’ strategy?

Probably not.

There are too many forces at play in school districts across the country to assume that the Chicago model will work for them. But it does provide a moral boost for unions that might otherwise avoid sticking their necks out.

One of the new dynamics is the message that Emmanuel has sent to other Democrat mayors and politicians. He didn’t flat out diss the union the way the Republicans bash teachers’ unions, but he made it clear that they were selfishly holding back progress – a basic theme for GOP leaders and others who rant about “bully” unions.

If more Democrats nudge closer to Emmanuel’s tough guy take on the Chicago teachers, then the national teachers unions and organized labor as a whole has to reassess their partnership with them. But the teachers also need to better show their commitment to change, and not just for themselves. Without well-announced policies and game plan to carry them out, their foes will continue to hammer them.

But does anyone have solid, indisputable answers to how schools should fairly and accurate evaluate their teachers? It doesn’t seem so. And what are officials to do with their current staff as they shut schools because of low student performances, financial problems, shrinking enrollments and the growing tug of charter schools? Toss them onto the unemployment line and risk throwing out years of experience and commitment?

Saying Chicago’s teachers have not faced a new evaluation system in decades, city officials wanted student performances to account for as much a 40 percent of a teacher’s rating.  Union officials warned that the city’s plans could mean several thousands jobs cuts in a few years. Instead, the contract sets student performance measures to the minimum required by Illinois law: 25 percent in the first year of the contract rising to 30 percent in the last year.

During the walkout, the union and others howled about the inadequacies of judging teachers based so heavily on their students’ performances. And as a New York Times chart shows, most of the nation’s larger school systems have are wrangling with this.

Fearful about school closings that have trimmed jobs as well as the CTU’s ranks, the union fought for a recall policy to protect laid off teachers. The union compromised, agreeing to a deal that will require half of all vacancies to be filled by teachers hurt by school closings. But Emanuel said school principals will have greater flexibility than before in their hiring.

Protecting its ranks is crucial for the union. Chicago school officials pled financial distress before the strike, and the teachers’ 7 percent total pay hike over the three-year contract along with other pay boosts raises the likelihood of school closings. So, too, school officials appear intent on bolstering the charter schools, which today have over 50,000 students.

Along with teachers’ complaints about inadequate facilities for themselves, and inadequate services for their students, another, perhaps bigger, issue bubbled up during the strike. It’s one that Chicago’s teachers share with others and it’s probably the most daunting for the nation’s schools.

It’s sense of unfairness and blindness to the reality the teachers say they face.

Chicago’s teachers work in schools marked by economic and racial isolation, schools where more than four out of five students are minorities as well as low income. As the teachers and others have pointed out, the schools in some of the most economically impacted and racially isolated neighborhoods in Chicago have suffered the greatest number of closings and with questionable results for many of the students. So, too, one of the gripes aired by teachers during the strike was that black teachers lately have shouldered a heavy share of layoffs.

Chicago teachers deal with students and communities marked and traumatized by violence. Yet the funding for anti-violence efforts, like many other basic social services, has been trimmed back due to financial problems.

The police have saturated some black and Latino neighborhoods, going after gangs, whom they say are behind the spike in violence. But neighbors in these communities increasingly say the gangs are not the sole cause. And the Police Superintendent recently admitted that the police “are treading water” in their effort to contain the pool of blood.

The mayor has cajoled neighbors to speak out more and show greater cooperation with police to stop the crime, as if the communities have been blind to the mayhem. The regular stream of anti-violence marches in the streets and the flight of thousands of blacks out of Chicago in recent years seems a message that the community knows very well what’s happening.

As a nation, we are bedeviled by the question of how best to teach our youth. But in places like Chicago, the challenge is more intense and basic. Schools in Chicago, Detroit, Los Angles, New York and on countless other places are asked to come up with solutions to problems that others long ago gave up on. The welfare system no longer redirects stunted ambitions. The prisons and courts no longer rehabilitate.

But the schools are not allowed to falter.

This was the real issue that the teachers and Chicago officials were arguing over.


"But does anyone have solid, indisputable answers to how schools should fairly and accurate evaluate their teachers? It doesn’t seem so."

This question is easy to answer....just look at how its done in the private sector. Tghe real issue is that teacher unions will continue to squelch any attempt to impose meaningful evaluation.

Well, how is it done in "the private sector?" I suppose you are talking about private schools, yew? I understand the charter schools don't have to because their teachers all leave after three years anyway. I'd really like to hear how schools like Choate or Groton eveluate their teachers. Those schools have such a high reputation they must have good teachers, right? Or do they just have teachers with good connections, who come from the right families? I really don't know. How do the Catholic schools evaluate their teachers? Do they evaluate lay teachers differently from teaching sisters? Curious minds want to know. I can tell you this, though. Making tests that tell you something is hard, hard, hard. I worked as a teacher for several years and had to make tests to try to discover what my students needed more work on, and it's hard. It's hard even to know what it is your test is measuring. And I can tell you for absolutely sure, the tests don't measure teacher performance, they were not designed to measure teacher performance, and if you try to use them to measure teacher performance you are using the wrong tool.

Empower management to fire/hire people and then hold them responsible for the results.

CTU "won" because Rahm needed to kick the can on this past the election year. Given the financial status of the City and the enormous pension shortfalls, Rahm will not be able to meet the terms of this contract next year and it will all replay itself.

Rahm and lots of Dems at the state and city level are looking at Wisconsin with envy. There is no way that half the major cities and many states avoid bankruptcy without breaking public sector unions but to kill the CTU 2 months before the presidential election would cost Rahm his patron and Obama his cash cow.

Public sector unions are doomed and deservedly so. Most of the rest of the unions will go the way of the dodo too unless they learn something from the trade unions. They have to actually produce skilled workers to compete in the 21st century.

Union 1
Students 0

Union 1
Students 0

Union 1
Students 0

Excellent follow up article. Raises important questions and links the Chicago struggle to those in other big cities. I am still waiting to hear the union's explanation as to how this strike and this contract benefits children. And what they would have done differently to create a better learning environment for kids. The School Board and City get new performance standards, more flexibility in managing schools and teachers, and some financial relief. Kids get to go back to school. Parents get some hope the worst schools will be replaced with better ones. Teachers continue to provide a beacon of empathy and excellence for their pupils. But what has the union accomplished? They seem to be defending dues and lost causes, instead of trying to create a better place for kids, parents and teachers.

The biggest benefit for the children is not in the contract and has nothing to do with the pay. The pay issue, by the way, was only important because the Illinois legislature passed a law limiting collective bargaining to pay. The important concession was the agreement to spend some money on the schools that have been starved of maintenance funds for the last twenty-five years. That's how long the right has been working to destroy public schools. And, yes, Rahm Emmanuel is a right-wing, corporate tool, just like his former boss. He has to pay back for that sixteen million dollars they paid him for fourteen months work.

You need to be logged in to comment.
(If there's one thing we know about comment trolls, it's that they're lazy)