Climate crisis

A Devastating Drought

Across the Midwest and the South, crops fail and farmers suffer from the driest conditions in 50 years.

The widest drought to grip the United States in 50 years is getting worse with no signs of abating. Government agencies report that 71 percent of the country is experiencing "abnormally dry" conditions since June, double the area as last summer—when, for perspective, the drought resulted in $12 billion of losses in the Southern Plains and Southwest. Some climatologists are referring to this year's drought as a "flash drought" because lack of rainfall has led to drought conditions over a few months, rather than over seasons or years.

Droughts Don't Kill Jobs. People Do

The House Natural Resources Committee has been [trying for a little while](http://naturalresources.house.gov/Issues/Issue/?IssueID=5921) to pin environmentalists with responsibility for the man-made drought in California. How can a drought be man-made? In this case, irrigation to the state's Central Valley was scaled back after environmentalists argued successfully in court that diverting the water from the Sacramento-San Joaquin delta was killing endangered fish. The man-made drought is simply the Valley dealing with its natural water supply, or lack thereof.

Republicans Kill Jobs.

The Senate extended TANF, the basic welfare bill, which was set to expire after a temporary extension in December, but didn't include reauthorizing the Emergency Fund, a provision of the stimulus bill that encouraged employers to hire low-income, unemployed workers by partially subsidizing their paychecks. The emergency fund expired in September but the hope was that it would be renewed.

The School-Lunch Problem.

According to Politico, First Lady Michelle Obama is busy trying to get House Democrats to pass the Senate's version of child nutrition legislation that would provide a little bit more money for every school lunch, update nutrition guidelines, and make it easier for lower-income children to enroll in the free-lunch program. The problem with the Senate version, of course, is that it offsets the cost of the bill by cutting into scheduled food-stamp increases down the road.

The House and Food-Stamp Funding.

Members of the House are traveling back to Washington today so that they can vote on the $26 billion aid bill to the states that the Senate passed last week. Annie Lowrey at the Washington Independent tells us, however, that some members, led by Rep. Rose DeLauro of Connecticut, are upset about the source of offset funding -- rolling back the food-stamp expansion called for in the stimulus bill.

As Lowrey notes, the problem is that pushing through a different bill from what the Senate has already passed would require the Senate to rush back from recess.

Help for Low-Income Workers.

For some time now, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities has urged an extension of a provision of the stimulus bill that allowed welfare funds to fully or partially subsidize the wages of low-income workers who are newly hired by private employers. The fund, known as the TANF Emergency Fund, is set to expire Sept. 30. That may jeopardize the jobs of many workers and employers in the states that used the fund to spur hiring among employers who wouldn't hire otherwise, and get jobs for low-income workers who might not have otherwise gotten one.

Today in Straw Man Construction.

Greg Mankiw asserts that the "Democratic Party is attacking some Republican congressmen for both opposing the stimulus bill and also helping direct some stimulus spending into their districts," and -- correctly, given the premise -- goes on to argue that the alleged attacks are illogical. The problem with Mankiw's argument can be easily seen when you examine what the Democrats are actually arguing:

Where's Our Hopkins?

Today, TAPPED will feature a series of guest posts on progressive solutions to the unemployment problem. Harold Meyerson is the editor-at-large for The American Prospect.

As usual, the redoubtable Dean Baker has a slew of smart suggestions -- all of them Keynesian -- on how to restart our stalled economy. I particularly like his work-sharing suggestion, partly modeled on the German experience (and German unemployment is at least 2 points lower than ours just now).

A Quick Look at the HUD Budget.

Most immediately, the proposed 2011 budget for the Department of Housing and Urban Development calls for a 5 percent reduction in its budget from last year, which in turn was a 9 percent increase from the year before. In the introduction, Secretary Shaun Donovan writes that last year's increase was necessary because of the declining economy and because the agency had been neglected.This year they had the ability to make more targeted reductions and increases, he said.

The Hidden Stimulus In the Budget.

The analysts and officials I've spoken to today generally see three goals in the new budget for fiscal year 2011: Deal with the short-term problems of the recession, lower medium- and long-term deficits, and make good policy with a focus on "middle-class security." I'm going to post about all of these things, but let's start with how the budget addresses the recession.

A Congress Carol.

Tim Fernholz imagines a world without a filibuster:

What a year for Congress! In February, it passed an $820 billion fiscal stimulus with more infrastructure investment than tax cuts. By April, it approved the president's landmark progressive budget. In June, an unprecedented energy bill complete with carbon cap-and-trade provisions passed. Then, in September, it agreed to a bill to eliminate subsidies to private education lenders in favor of direct federal loans for college, with much of the savings directed to Pell Grants for low-income students. Next, it passed a major health-care reform bill in November, complete with a public insurance option. By December, an omnibus financial regulatory reform bill had cleared.

Republicans Give the Game Away on Stimulus.

stimuluslogo.jpgTypically, whenever you see a project funded by the stimulus, there is a sign near by pointing out that it was funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. It lets the public know what they're getting for their money. It turns out the signs are pretty expensive -- weird, right? can't they just get cheaper signs? -- and that some states are forgoing that expenditure to put their stimulus money toward something more tangible.

States of Distress.

Robert Kuttner argues that a second stimulus could help states avoid layoffs, program cuts, and tax hikes:

Economic growth declined by only 1 percent from April through June, compared to 6.4 percent in the first quarter -- in these times that passes for good news. Without the Obama stimulus of $787 billion, the damage would be far worse. But there are two areas of the economy where still-deteriorating conditions require more federal intervention. One is unemployment -- 9.5 percent and heading for double digits. The other is the condition of state and local government.