International Democrat Union

It's Never Too Early to Plan for 2012.

One of the odd things about this year's election was how much attention was garnered by what turned out to be some some rather unimportant candidates, like Christine O'Donnell and that Nazi re-enactor guy. In truth, there was a wide variety among even those identified as Tea Party candidates -- some of whom were genuinely nuts, and some of whom were really just ordinary Republicans who saw the opportunity to jump on board a fast-moving train. That's true even of those who got elected. Rand Paul, for instance, doesn't seem to be all that smart, knows virtually nothing about government, and is nearly impossible to imagine turning into an effective legislator.

A Lesson for the Democrats.

It's an early exit poll, and we should obey all the important caveats about not trusting those, but since bloviation is the order of the hour, consider this from Marc Ambinder:

Who's to blame for the economy? Bankers (34%), Bush (29%), Obama (24%). Of those who blame bankers, Republicans hold an 11 point advantage.

Those Anti-Business ... Republicans?

So the Kenyan Socialist we have in the White House is so anti-business that America's corporations are now facing record-high corporate profits and undergoing mild criticism for their offshoring practices. Luckily, Republicans are already itching to restart coordinating policy with the business-lobbying community -- after they punish any company that tried to work constructively with the Democrats, that is.

Boring Explanations for Elections.

Part of the reason pundits and journalists don't much like the analysis of political scientists about elections is that political science can be kind of boring. Political science tells us, for instance, that structural factors are much more important than the actual conduct of campaigns. If you want to know what's going to happen in an election, just use a few variables, particularly economic ones like real income growth or unemployment, and you can predict with a fair degree of accuracy what the outcome will be.

Lightning Round: The Motives of Republicans and Conservatives are Subtly Distinct.

  • Matt Yglesias says, "The modern American conservative movement does not care -- even a little bit -- about the size of the budget deficit," which requires a bit of clarification, I think. The Republican Party -- demonstrably -- does not care about the budget deficit, but I'm sure some movement conservatives do as a matter of principle. But insofar as there is overlap between the party and the movement on this issue, they are each seeking different things. Republicans want power, and whining about the deficit is one way to get there.

Tea Party Candidates Aren't Actually Rebels.

Tea Party candidates plan to buck the party leaders once they get to Washington:

Insurgent Republican candidates hoping to win election to the United States Senate have made one thing clear: They are not coming to Washington to make friends. [...]

But, while these potential new members of the Senate defeated establishment-favored GOP contenders in their states’ primaries by promising to upset the status quo in Washington, former and current Republican aides aren’t expecting a political earthquake. They say they’re confident that McConnell will deftly handle the new conservative arrivals by incorporating them — and their ideas — into the larger caucus.

Life Under Citizens United.

A useful article on campaign spending for 2010 House races by Michael Luo and Griff Palmer begins by noting that in contested races Democrats have actually outraised and outspent their Republican opponents. This is not, however, the whole story:

Republican-leaning third-party groups, however, many of them financed by large, unrestricted donations that are not publicly disclosed, have swarmed into the breach, pouring more than $60 million into competitive races since July, about 80 percent more than the Democratic-leaning groups have reported spending.

Divided Government Is Going to Be Lame as All Get Out.

With all this talk of the Republicans taking the House, there's also been talk of the dubious virtues of divided government. It's undeniable that at least some people will support the GOP because they feel it's better to have two parties splitting control of Congress than just one in charge. Unfortunately, if their goal is to temper the Democrats' agenda with bipartisan feel-goodery, it won't work. It'll just ensure that nothing gets done.

It's Not Over Till It's Over.

Daniel Larison is still bearish on the odds that Republicans will win a majority in November:

At this point, it appears that Republicans will gain 35 seats. If all of the toss-ups broke for the Republicans, they could realistically gain 41, which would be just enough, but all of them are not going to break their way. [...] The least certain pick-ups are AR-01, ND-AL, OH-18, MI-07, NH-02, NV-03, and SC-05, but I am still assuming Republicans win these. Democratic pick-ups will include the three everyone expects in LA-02, DE-AL and IL-10, and will most likely include Hawaii’s First District and Florida’s 25th.

No Retreat, No Surrender.

If Democrats end up losing the House next week, as seems likely (though not certain), it's obviously going to bring a period of calm, reason, and cooperation to Washington. Just kidding, of course -- as I argued last week, the Republicans who get elected are going to be even more conservative than the already extremely conservative caucus, and less willing to compromise. Not only that, the ones who've been around for a while will be terrified of getting a primary challenge from the right, and so will be even more likely to give in to their base's demands.

The Demographic Gap.

Republicans should heed David Frum's point about generalizing from November's elections:

Be very careful about projecting forward from the 2010 congressional results to the 2012 presidential vote. These elections almost occur in two different countries.

Be very careful about assuming that Republican success in 2010 signifies that Republicans have overcome the longer-term problems that I’ve been writing about these past five years. If Republicans cannot connect better to the huge new Millennial generation, next month’s success will only be a happy interval before 2012’s grim challenges.

Bigger Waves, Weaker Classes.

Charlie Cook makes a good point:

The one sobering thought that veteran Republican consultants are already contemplating is that the larger the wave this year, the more difficult it will be to hold onto some of these seats in 2012 and 2014 in the House and 2016 in the Senate.

The bigger the wave, the weaker the class and the harder it will be to hold onto those seats. Democrats only have to look at their 2006 and 2008 classes for plenty of examples.

Pages