Lieberman

McCain, Lieberman, and Gadhafi Walk Into a Bar ...

I wrote yesterday about how President Obama may be wrong to believe that he has “no permanent enemies” -- especially when it comes to the Republican leadership hell-bent on destroying him. Well, once he figures that out, maybe he could teach John McCain and Joe Lieberman a thing or two.

Without further ado, a tweet from John McCain, circa August 2009:

Connecticut Democrats Are Happy.

Sen. Joseph Lieberman played a central role in rallying votes for repeal of "don't ask, don't tell," but his advisers likely realized that this was too little, too late to entirely redeem him.

CBO Says Public Option Would Reduce Defict; No Minds Changed

Sorry for the cynical headline, but the news that the Congressional Budget Office scored Rep. Pete Stark's proposal to add a public option to the coming insurance exchanges as reducing the deficit by $53 billion through 2019 is all well and good, but it won't change the minds of anyone who opposed it the first time around. First of all, there is virtually no such thing as a true "deficit hawk" in Washington. Concern about deficits is a handy excuse everyone uses to justify cuts in programs they already don't like.

Chicken Little-ing Lieberman’s 'Kill Switch.'

If you track tech politics closely, there’s a good chance you can spot a Declan McCullagh column before you glance at the byline. McCullagh, a reporter and commentator for CNET, has a tendency to hang any tech news of the day on an anti-government framework, rarely stopping at healthy skepticism when there's a chance to spark full-blown hysteria. By his own admission, McCullagh started the ridiculous and harmful “Al Gore invented the Internet” meme in the late '90s. McCullagh’s latest hit tearing up the Web is that the Senate is considering a Sen.

Lieberman's Slippery Slope.

While Sen. Chuck Schumer has backed out of supporting Sen. Joe Lieberman's proposal to allow the State Department to strip citizenship from Americans suspected of associating with terrorist groups, Lieberman is getting some Democratic support (moral, at least) not only from the bill's co-sponsor in the House, Jason Altmire, but Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Speaker Nancy Pelosi:

Two More Responses to the Lieberman Bill.

Citizenship expert Peter J. Spiro gives a bit more detail on the process for relinquishing citizenship. He says it might be constitutional, but Sen. Joe Lieberman's proposal to strip citizenship from suspected terrorists still wouldn't work:

They're Calling It the "TEA" Act.

Legal experts, including former State Department Legal Adviser John Bellinger, have already slammed Sen. Joe Lieberman's proposal to strip citizenship from American citizens accused of being involved with a foreign terrorist organization. After expressing initial support, Sen. Chuck Schumer later backed out.

Lieberman Proposing Don't Ask, Don't Tell Repeal Bill.

Joe Lieberman is reportedly proposing a bill next week that would repeal the "don't ask, don't tell" law that prevents gays and lesbians from serving openly in the military. Jamie Kirchick, who interviews Lieberman, comments:

WASHINGTON - Just when you thought Joe Lieberman couldn't frustrate and perplex liberals any further, he is going off to become chief sponsor of the most significant piece of socially progressive legislation that Congress will deal with this year.

Dissecting Lieberman.

As Sen. Joe Lieberman continually moves the goal posts for reform, contradicting his own stated beliefs of what he would prefer in a health-care package and straight up lying about what the legislation does, everyone is trying to understand his logic. Bloggers are scouring Lieberman's past statements, the platform he ran on before, interviews, website caches, whatever they can find for an "ah-ha!" hypocrisy hit. And it's pretty easy to do.

Should Charlie Brown Keep Trying To Kick the Football?

Ta-Nehisi Coates doesn't think (and I agree) that Joe Lieberman will pay any price for his disgraceful behavior on health care and that while Lieberman "deserves" to lose his chairmanship, "it's simply not clear to me that--in terms of passing legislation--the Dems would be better off" if Lieberman got his just deserts. David Kurtz agrees with less regret. I don't disagree with the idea that getting good legislation passed is more important than taking revenge per se.

A Little More Lieberman.

lieberdog.jpgA few weeks ago I was talking to Matt Lewis about Sen. Joe Lieberman, and he suggested that Lieberman's antipathy to the liberal causes he traditionally supports comes from his bitterness about progressive efforts to unseat him in 2006.

Another Good Word, Ruined.

Here in Washington, certain words don't seem to mean what they mean elsewhere. I remember some years ago, Christopher Hitchens pointing out that the word "perception" generally means insight or understanding. But in Washington, it means something false, as in "perception is reality," or "the perception of George W. Bush as a heroic president."

Ezra Klein noted a similar reversal a few months ago: In the external world, "reconciliation" means a peaceful reunification, as in the end of a family feud. But in Washington, the word represents "the most divisive thing you could do."

Letting Lieberman Off the Hook.

The big news coming out of the Sunday shows is that Joe “with Democrats on everything but the war” Lieberman told Bob Schieffer on Face the Nation that he is so vehemently opposed to the inclusion of a public option in health-care reform that he would join Republicans in their filibuster of the bill if it contains the provision. When Schieffer noted that that would mean no reform at all, Lieberman happily proclaimed that he would prefer no reform to reform that included the public option.

At Least Pretend You Know What You're Talking About, Lieberman.

mcliberlindsy.jpgSen. Joe Lieberman has announced his intention to join the Republicans in filibustering any health-care bill that includes a public insurance option. Why, you might ask?