Luo people

The Best Offense Is a Cheaper Defense

Republicans are open to significantly slashing the defense budget. Too bad the president isn't pushing for it.

(Flickr/gregwest98)

Progressives don't need more reasons to be disappointed with President Barack Obama's handling of the deficit talks, but here's another failing that has not gotten much play: The administration has been so timid on defense cuts that some leading Republicans are now well to the president's left on this issue.

Sharply downsizing the Pentagon -- which is projected to otherwise spend over $7 trillion through 2020 -- is one of the most obvious ways to reduce deficits. Yet without the strong backing of the commander in chief -- not to mention the negotiator in chief -- big defense cuts will never happen.

Winning the Battle but Losing the War

When 62 percent percent of Americans agree that the Republican Party should compromise on budget negotiations, it’s obvious that President Obama is winning the politics of the debt-ceiling negotiations. On the other hand, when 47 percent of Americans say that spending cuts will create jobs – as they did in the most recent Washington Post/ABC News survey – it’s clear that Obama is losing the larger ideological battle over the role of government.

Obama Dumps Policy for Politics

There is a brief respite today after the flurry of White House summits between President Obama and leaders from Congress. The two sides spent the week negotiating a way to bridge the impasse on raising the debt ceiling that, if not resolved by Aug 2, threatens to permanently alter the United State's credit standing. Obama went before reporters this morning for his second press conference of the week.

Out-Hawking the Deficit Hawks

There are two ways for Democrats to assess which of the deals coming out of the debt-ceiling negotiations is best. There are a few deals out there that, according to the polls, will be most popular -- ones that would reduce the deficit by up to $4 trillion with a mix spending cuts and revenue increases. And then there's the deal that will have the lowest cost in human suffering -- a clean vote to raise the debt ceiling without a deficit-reduction package. Those are not, sadly, the same deal. But they also aren't that far off.

Thank You, Eric Cantor

Michael Shear reports for The New York Times that House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) has become the new Democratic boogeyman on the debt-ceiling negotiations. This makes sense:Cantor has been the loudest voice against revenue increases in a debt deal. His hard opposition to any new revenues was responsible for trashing both the negotiations led by Vice President Joe Biden as well as the “grand bargain” proposed by President Obama.

Is Obama Playing Politics or Does He Really Believe in Austerity?

For the second time in three weeks, President Obama's has given a press conference on the troubled debt-ceiling negotiations. This time, he stated his opposition to a short-term extension of the debt ceiling and called on Republicans to put aside partisanship, and agree to a long-term compromise on spending and revenues.

Cornel West's Telepathy

Jesse Washington has a new piece exploring the uneven impact of the recession on the black middle class, with some really startling information on just how profoundly black homeowners have been impacted, noting that, “In 2009, for every dollar of wealth the average white household had, black households only had two cents.” That's in part because black people were disproportionately likely to have their wealth tied up in their homes, and so were particularly devastated by the foreclosure crisis.

Obama Drifts Away

Though he wrote the column before today's abysmal jobs report, Paul Krugman's latest on President Obama and the budget fight probably reflects what a lot of liberals are feeling right now:

It's getting harder and harder to trust Mr. Obama’s motives in the budget fight, given the way his economic rhetoric has veered to the right. In fact, if all you did was listen to his speeches, you might conclude that he basically shares the G.O.P.'s diagnosis of what ails our economy and what should be done to fix it. And maybe that’s not a false impression; maybe it's the simple truth.

Republicans Slam the Breaks on Transportation Investment

Over on the homepage, Jason Mark has an article on how the transportation bill reauthorization could finally be an opportunity for progressives in Congress to begin tackling climate change. "Transportation accounts for more than two-thirds of the nation’s oil use and about 25 percent of its carbon-dioxide emissions," Jason writes. Shifting funds in the transportation bill away from highway construction and redirecting it toward mass transit might not immediately solve the country's emissions problem, but it would at least give consumers greater options to lower their carbon footprint.

Whither Warren?

The Washington Post has a well-meaning but wrongheaded piece by Yale law professor Ian Ayers on how to break the logjam that Republicans have created around the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). Forty-four Senate Republicans have written a letter to President Obama vowing to block any nominee unless the agency’s powers are substantially watered down. Progressives have been pressing Obama to make a recess appointment of Elizabeth Warren.

Ayers’ scheme is that Obama should make that temporary appointment of Warren but give the nomination on a permanent basis to Federal Reserve Board member Sarah Bloom Raskin.

What Obama Didn't Say

President Barack Obama marked a dramatic change in the war in Afghanistan in a major speech Wednesday night. In broad strokes, he laid out the framework for how to wind down the war: by declaring victory and transitioning control to the Afghans in the context of an Afghan-led political reconciliation with the insurgency. "We are meeting our goals," he declared, and -- in a surprising twist -- endorsed a political reconciliation with the Taliban for the first time.

However, what President Obama did not say in his speech is almost as significant as what he did say.

Fallout

Neocons want Congress to play nice with Obama on Libya.

U.S. dismisses charges against Osama bin Laden after shooting him in the face.

The Senate's detainee provisions are coming together.

Our Side and Theirs

I've found over the years that one of the principal challenges of opinion writing -- in addition to consistently having original things to say -- is being conscious enough of your own biases that you can make a strong case for your side that might possibly be persuasive to those who don't already agree with you. You can get a certain amount of mileage out of creative name-calling and assuming the worst motives in your opponents, but that route is ultimately limiting. As I've tried to be more thoughtful about my own writing, the more bored I've gotten with a certain kind of partisanship, the kind that dominates talk radio, for instance.

Today at The Prospect

  • Robert Kuttner tells how unions have played a role in Dominique Strauss-Kahn's sexual assault case.
  • Yannis Palaiologos writes about Greece's surprisingly peaceful protests against the wave of austerity that has swept the European Union.
  • Scott Martelle explains the common reaction to President Barack Obama's nominee for secretary of commerce, John Bryson.

Spiking Obama on High Gas Prices

Ben Smith [has a story this morning](http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0611/56297.html) about Americans for Prosperity's first whack at Obama on gas prices. This is Obama's most vulnerable flank as 2012 approaches, and the more the right can pound into people's heads that the president is responsible for high gas prices, the better off their candidates will be.

Pages