AGAINST ASTRONOMIC NITPICKING. The Pluto wars seem to have finally come to a conclusion as astronomers decide it’s not a planet after all under their new definition of planet. The Associated Press reports: “The new definition of what is — and isn’t — a planet fills a centuries-old black hole for scientists who have labored since Copernicus without one.”

I think this is silly. If astronomy has been proceeding since Copernicus without a rigorous definition of “planet” — which is certainly my understanding — then obviously the world doesn’t need a rigorous definition. It’s just a folk-cultural term and it denotes nine entities, one of which is Pluto. There’s no need for a bunch of busybody astronomers to make trouble for everyone else.

–Matthew Yglesias

Matthew Yglesias is a senior editor at the Center for American Progress Action Fund, a former Prospect staff writer, and the author of Heads in the Sand: How the Republicans Screw Up Foreign Policy and Foreign Policy Screws Up the Democrats. Follow @mattyglesias