It wasn’t one of the civil-rights cases activists were clamoring for, but AMP v. Myriad Genetics may prove to to be one of this Supreme Court term’s most consequential rulings.
Scott Lemieux
Scott Lemieux is a political science professor at the University of Washington. He writes for the blog Lawyers, Guns & Money. Follow @lemieuxlgm
Justice after the Fact
The Supreme Court decides in Peugh v. United States that defendants cannot be sentenced with punishments that did not exist at the time of the crime.
How All Three Branches Conspired to Threaten Your Privacy
Checks and balances have not worked in the way the framers envisioned.
The Verizon Data Order and Why It Matters
Creating “national security” exemptions to the Fourth Amendment in the context of an open-ended conflict where the whole world is the battlefield and the conflict has no clear end point is very dangerous.
Scalia Gets It Right
In Maryland v. King, the Supreme Court has ruled that DNA information can be used from someone arrested for but not convicted of an offense.
Shorting the D.C. Circuit
Even if his three simultaneous judicial nominees are blocked, it’s a win-win situation for the president that just might mean the beginning of the end for the filibuster.
Three Questions Obama Needs to Answer in His Speech
The president is giving a major counterterrorism speech today. Here are some things we’d like to know.
The DOJ’s Freedom of Speech Breach
The seizure of AP’s phone records is legal, but that doesn’t make it an acceptable course of action for the Justice Department to take.
D.C. Circuit v. Worker Rights
The latest example of the federal court bending over backward to defend business interests is yet another reminder of why judicial appointments matter.
The House Takes Mass Incarceration to Task
Will the Over-Criminalization Task Force be able to put a dent in our soaring rates of incarceration, or will it fall into the same rancor that defines every D.C. debate?
