I certainly respect E.J. Dionne far more than I do Will Saletan. But it must be said that his new column has a pretty strong whiff of the “originating policies pro-choicers have been advocating for many decades” routine that Saletan has patented. Apparently, the solution to ending the conflict over abortion includes “contraception programs, even […]
Scott Lemieux
Scott Lemieux is a political science professor at the University of Washington. He writes for the blog Lawyers, Guns & Money. Follow @lemieuxlgm
EXIT POLLS AND RETROSPECTIVE BANDWAGONS.
Bob Somerby, responding to CNN’s exit polls: It’s hard to believe that those data are accurate. Did four percent of last week’s voters really vote for someone other than Bush or Kerry in 2004? And what would explain that nine-point gap between Bush and Kerry voters? In theory, Democrats were enthusiastic about last week’s election, […]
YET MORE BACKLASH.
Jeffrey Rosen‘s dialogue partner, Richard Just, makes several very good points here. Two are worthy of emphasis. First, he’s right to say that “I am not convinced that the backlash against gay marriage is fueled primarily by a dislike for judicial tyranny. Rather, I think it’s fueled primarily by a dislike for … gay marriage.” […]
NOTHING. NOT EVEN THE FEE FOR THE GAMING LICENSE.
I swear this is a “verbatim”, not a “shorter”: According to the aide, Lieberman‘s met with Harry Reid and discussions were very friendly. Reid wanted him to step down from his post as chairman of Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs in exchange for heading a lesser committee. Lieberman reminded Reid of how loyal he’s been […]
MORE PROP 8 “BACKLASH” ARGUMENTS.
Jeffrey Rosen tries to spin the narrow passage of Prop 8 into a triumph for his prediction that In Re: Marriage would instigate a massive backlash, and he’s no more persuasive than McArdle. The central problems remain the same: He doesn’t explain how the decision made the status quo worse or made the entrenchment of […]
A FAILURE OF LEADERSHIP.
Kevin Drum suggests that “Obama has a notable streak of temperamental caution that serves him well, but it could also betray him. Maybe he could have turned the tide against Proposition 8 in California if he’d been willing to take a risk on its behalf.” In this case, it’s a fair knock. I can understand […]
INITIATIVES, GOOD AND BAD.
I was surprised by the results of two major initiatives yesterday. The pleasant surprise was Measure 11 in South Dakota. The rape-and-incest exemptions, while essentially meaningless in terms of how a ban would actually work on the ground, are the kind of superficial “moderation” that I was worried would suck in enough additional voters to […]
WHAT A MCCAIN COURT WOULD BE (AND WHAT IT WOULDN’T).
Since we haven’t heard much about the courts in this election, I suppose it’s worth noting that given the likely retirements of Ginsburg (75-year-old cancer survivor), Souter (69, hates D.C., and isn’t crazy about the job) and Stevens (in college when the word “damn” could generate national controversy; may have seen Cap Anson play live) […]
CONSERVATIVE DOMINATION OF THE FEDERAL COURTS.
As a welcome companion to Steven Calabresi‘s silly ranting about how — horrors! — Barack Obama may completely transform the federal courts (if a whole bunch of relatively young judges retire en masse, of course), Charlie Savage brings some data about the extent to which Bush has transformed the federal courts. Democrats control exactly … […]
REVISTING ROE’S STATUS.
TAP alumna Kay Steiger has an excellent article about how vulnerable Roe is under the current Supreme Court, which quotes yours truly. The bottom line for me remains that the argument that Roe’s overturn is imminent depends on the belief that Kennedy has changed, and I just don’t think there’s any evidence that he has. […]

