And it remains far from clear that collecting metadata is a better means of protecting national security than searches based on individual suspicion.
Scott Lemieux
Scott Lemieux is a political science professor at the University of Washington. He writes for the blog Lawyers, Guns & Money. Follow @lemieuxlgm
One Small Step for the Fourth Amendment
Obama’s NSA reforms are a start, but they don’t go far enough.
Can States Protect Access to Reproductive Health Clinics?
The fate of Massachusetts’s buffer-zone law doesn’t look promising after yesterday’s Supreme Court oral arguments.
A Farce in Cooperstown
Tearing to shreds the argument against putting Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens in the Baseball Hall of Fame—or letting Deadspin have their say in the matter.
No, Obamacare Wasn’t a “Republican” Proposal
Why this oft-repeated and very wrong idea is both unfair to the Affordable Care Act and far too fair to American conservatives.
Polyamory, the Right to Privacy, and Religious Freedom
A federal District Court judge in Utah sides with the right to privacy and religious freedom.
Four Takeaways from Yesterday’s NSA Ruling
The U.S. District Court decided that the NSA’s collection of phone metadata is likely unconstitutional. What does that mean?
The Year in Preview: The First Amendment Takes Center Stage
Can we look forward to another year of less than wonderful decisions from the Roberts Court?
Rewarding Reduced Crime Rates—Not Mass Incarceration
A new Brennan Center report offers advice on how to deal with the United States’ prison disaster.
The Affordable Care Act v. Supreme Court, Round 2
Diving into the two contraception-mandate cases the high court will hear this term: Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. Sebelius and Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.

