Adele M. Stan
Adele M. StanNov 15, 2007
Chris Dodd just made a lovely speech about ending the shrillness of the debate between the Democrats, and suggested that he was the one who could bring the party together. Of course, he's spent the last several weeks suggesting that the frontrunner -- who happens to be a woman -- was not electable (most likely because she is a woman). So I guess he'll be bringing together the men in the party. That's who really counts, no? --Adele M. Stan
Adele M. StanNov 15, 2007
So says John Edwards . "...not even me," he said of himself. Then he went on to bash Hillary Clinton on her vote on the resolution regarding Iran and her acceptance of campaign cash from lobbyists, with the word "corruption" slung around. Then when Hillary took issue, he raised his eyebrows and pursed his lips. Very Church Lady . --Adele M. Stan
Here's a look at Hillary Clinton's most vocal critics, helpfully sorted into categories. The question remains: Who hates her most?Adele M. StanNov 06, 2007
In the swirling mix of conviction and emotion that is politics, it's often easy to mistake resentment for reason, or vice versa. Nowhere is that more true than when looking at reaction to the presidential candidacy of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (NY). There are, indeed, principled reasons for a liberal not to embrace Clinton as her candidate, not least among them the New York senator's vote on the resolution that gave the president the go-ahead to invade Iraq. But among Hillary's most vocal critics, the reaction is something more visceral. The anti-Hillary vitriol from certain corners is to be expected. The religious right, after all, draws much of its power from its antifeminist agenda. I've long contended that the right's hatred of Bill Clinton stemmed not from his sexual misdeeds but from the fact that he married That Rodham Woman -- and didn't seem to have a problem with her spouting off, sounding smart, lawyering around. Nor did he seem to be henpecked; in fact, he seemed to be...
Adele M. StanNov 06, 2007
Among the lawyers and opposition figures rounded up, jailed or placed under house arrest is Asma Jahangir (sometimes spelled Jehangir), Pakistan's best-known feminist and human rights activist. UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon issued a statement calling for the release of Jahangir, currently the UN's special rapporteur for religious freedom , along with the other political detainees. In 1980, Jahangir, with her sister, Hina Jalini , opened Pakistan's first women-owned law firm, which became the center of opposition to the infamous Hudood Ordinance pronounced by the last U.S.-backed Pakistani dictator, Gen. Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq , the man who hanged Benazir Bhutto 's father. The Hudood Ordinance was trumpeted as a form of Islamization, but was, in essence, a declared war on women. Jahangir gained national fame defending a young, blind woman who was jailed after having been raped, charged with the crime of zina (extramarital sex). This was a common occurrence in Pakistan at the time, as...
Adele M. StanOct 31, 2007
In his essay on today's New York Times op-ed page, scholar François Furstenberg makes a comparison between the "with-us-or-for-them" rhetoric of the Bush administration and the avec-nous-ou-contre-la-révolution parlance of the pro-war faction that emerged from among the winners of the French Revolution. (As we say in Jersey, pardon my French.) The piece caught my eye because j'adore anything about the Enlightenment, even if it is a bit passé these days, what with chaos theory and waterboarding and people talking about inertia as if it's a bad thing. Among the so-last-era relics of the Enlightenment, the U.S. Constitution did warrant a mention or two in last night's Democratic debate. Alas, they came only from the mouth of Dennis Kucinich , the Clown Prince of Peace. (Note to DK: Keep your UFO sightings to yourself. I'm sure Thomas Jefferson saw a thing or two in the sky in his day, but not even in his own, secret self-made version of the Bible did he mention it...