Wendy Kaminer

Wendy Kaminer is a former senior correspondent for The American Prospect and a contributing editor at The Atlantic Monthly. She also serves on the national board of the American Civil Liberties Union.

A lawyer, social critic, and former Guggenheim Fellow, she writes about law, liberty, feminism, religion, and popular culture. Her latest book is Free for All: Defending Liberty in America Today. Other books she has written include Sleeping with Extra-Terrestrials: The Rise of Irrationalism and Perils of Piety; True Love Waits: Essays and Criticism; It's All the Rage: Crime and Culture; I'm Dysfunctional, You're Dysfunctional: The Recovery Movement and Other Self-Help Fashions; and A Fearful Freedom: Women's Flight from Equality. Kaminer's articles and reviews have appeared in many other publications, including The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Nation, and Newsweek, and her commentaries have aired on National Public Radio.

Before embarking on her writing career, Kaminer practiced law as a staff attorney in the New York Legal Aid Society and the New York City Mayor's Office.

Wendy Kaminer retains copyrights to all her articles.

Recent Articles

Judge-Made Rights

O n October 2, 2000, the European Convention on Human Rights will be incorporated into English law through the Human Rights Act. Britain ratified the international convention some 50 years ago, but did not codify it domestically and give English courts and English judges the power to enforce it. Litigants have had to travel to Strasbourg, France, to the European Court of Human Rights, in order to have claims under the convention vindicated. The European convention, adopted shortly after World War II, is hardly an unequivocal declaration of rights: A few rights are absolute, notably the rights not to be tortured or enslaved, and the convention is fairly forthright in its guarantee of fair-trial and due-process rights; but expressive rights--freedom of thought, religion, speech, and assembly--are greatly qualified. Speech rights, for example, are expressly limited by whatever restrictions are "prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national...

Taking Liberties: The New Assault on Freedom

Freedom is falling out of fashion all across the political spectrum, and new moves by Congress and the courts threaten basic liberties.

"F ree speech is a bourgeois prejudice," Lenin explained to Emma Goldman in 1920. If only it were so. With the approval of the bourgeois press and public, Goldman had been deported to Russia in 1919, after serving two years in prison for criticizing the U.S. government during wartime and opposing mandatory conscription. The American bourgeoisie—intolerant of free speech—strongly supported the prosecution, imprisonment, and exile of pacifists, anarchists, socialists, and other dissidents who opposed America's entry into the First World War. In wartime, the federal government criminalized mere rhetorical exhortations and expressions of unpopular ideals. The Espionage Act, enacted in 1917, prohibited willful interference with recruitment, enlistment, or service in the military, which was broadly construed to include political advocacy. In most instances, the Supreme Court upheld these draconian wartime restrictions on speech. But the Espionage Act cases also helped to...

Speaking of

T hree years ago, in Cambridge, Massachusetts, 10-year-old Jeffrey Curley was abducted, sexually assaulted, and murdered by two men, one of whom was allegedly a member of the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), founded in 1978. Both of his assailants, Charles Jaynes and Salvatore Sicari, are now serving life sentences for murder. They have also been found liable for Jeffrey's wrongful death in a civil suit that ended in a symbolic $328 million damage award to the Curley family. But according to Jeffrey's parents, Robert and Barbara Curley, Jaynes and Sicari were not solely responsible for their son's murder. They blame it also on NAMBLA and have filed a $200-million wrongful-death suit in federal court against the group, seven of its alleged members, and its Internet service provider. Some have compared this case to the successful 1999 lawsuit against anti-abortion activists who maintained an alleged "hit list" of abortion providers, or to recent lawsuits against white...

Safety and Freedom

Of all the lame excuses offered for the failures of U.S. intelligence and security that facilitated the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the most disingenuous was the repeated claim that antiterrorism efforts have been restrained by respect for America's freedoms. Tell that to the victims of harsh counterterrorism and immigration laws passed in the aftermath of the Oklahoma City bombing: the Arab Americans who were wrongfully imprisoned for several years on the basis of secret evidence; the asylum seekers who have been turned away from our borders by low-level bureaucrats without ever receiving a hearing; the thousands of lawful immigrants imprisoned and threatened with deportation for minor offenses committed years ago. Tell it to the victims of racial profiling on our highways and in our airports. I don't doubt that some federal law-enforcement agents are honorable and respectful of individual freedom. But in general, the law-enforcement bureaucracy respects our...

Mob Rules:

Campus speech codes have been discredited in recent years, and talk about political correctness has waned, but self-righteous intolerance of dissent remains distressingly common among supposedly progressive students on liberal campuses. It surfaced most recently in efforts to prevent student newspapers from disseminating a now notorious political ad by right wing provocateur David Horowitz denouncing reparations for slavery. At Brown University, what The Boston Globe described as a "mob of students," seized the entire press run of The Brown Daily Herald and demanded formal apologies and financial compensation from Herald staffers for accepting Horowitz's ad. The young journalists, denounced as "student opportunists and careerists," held their ground, quite literally (they barricaded the door of the pressroom). At the University of Wisconsin, journalists at the Badger-Herald resisted a censorious mob with equal resolve. But student journalists on other campuses have shown little...