Features

This article is not online

In the late 1970s, a group of one-time liberals began describing themselves as neoliberals. ‘We criticize liberalism,” Charles Peters, editor of the neoliberal Washington Monthly, wrote in 1983, “not to destroy it but to renew it by freeing it from its myths, from its old automatic responses…” Neoliberals often join conservatives in lambasting public programs, […]

Robert Bork bids us to be faithful to the Founders and reject heretics who read theory into the law. But, like the Grand Inquisitor, he inwardly betrays his cause.

The history of social policy has a clear lesson. Programs that benefit all citizens do more to reduce poverty than programs targeted to the poor. So a new strategy for gamily security makes more sense than another War on Poverty.

The preoccupation with scandal has only aggravated the bureaucratic character of public services. A new “paradigm” for public service needs to emphasize quality of service, flexibility, and receptiveness to innovation–not just probity.

The conventional wisdom these days is that government intervention impedes development. Why, then, have Korea and Taiwan grown so fast?

Activists in the labor movement often find themselves at odds with the labor bureaucracy. Can business unionists learn to love labor organizers?

Rick Surpin wanted to create jobs for the poor by creating enterprises for them. In the process, he created a better model of home health care, too.

Many commentators are saying that “extremists on both sides” in the abortion debate need to compromise. But a close analysis of current proposals shows that even “moderate” restrictions impose real harm on many women.

As labor unions see their role diminish, others attempt to take their place as the employees’ representatives. Will it be lawyers, government regulators, or “human resource managers” in the executive suites? Or will the employees gain some direct rep