We continue the debate on affirmative action in response to Karen Paget’s “Diversity at Berkeley: Demogoguery or Demography” (TAP, Spring 1992) and Paul Starr’s “Civil Reconstruction: What to Do Without Affirmative Action” (TAP, Winter 1992) ADMISSIONS OMISSIONS BY LEWIS R. JONES T he University of California at Berkeley is one of the most selective large […]
Law and Justice
Posted inLaw and Justice
The Neglected Remedy
Scattershot regulation of drive-through deliveries and other abuses isn’t the only way to respond to the rise of managed care. There is another option: Giving consumers more of a say.
Posted inLaw and Justice
Unchecked and Unbalanced
Kenneth Starr’s behavior as independent counsel follows a pattern set in other investigations: the problem lies in the incentives and unchecked power of the office.
Posted inLaw and Justice
Sovereign Myopia
American values of internationalism, the rule of law, and human rights are finally being enshrined in a permanent world court. So why is the United States leading the charge against it?
Posted inLaw and Justice
Instant Replay: Three Strikes Was the Right Call
Instant Replay Three Strikes Was the Right Call John J. DiIulio, Jr. Jerome H. Skolnick’s essay on crime policy (“Wild Pitch: `Three Strikes, You’re Out’ And Other Bad Calls on Crime,” Spring 1994), omitted some important facts and ignored several valid arguments. Echoing the anti-incarceration consensus within criminology, Skolnick asserts that life without parole for […]
Posted inLaw and Justice
Lani Guinier’s Constitution
Guinier’s critics were only half right. She is a political radical–but no quota queen. As a constitutionalist, she was neither separatist nor undemocratic. She would have gotten along nicely with James Madison.
Posted inLaw and Justice
Imprisoners’ Dilemma
Low-level drug dealers will keep appearing, no matter how many jails we build.
Posted inLaw and Justice
A Constitutional Litmus Test
Justice may be blind, but in appointing justices Clinton needs to be far-sighted.