Should we blame Rupert Murdoch for the fact that the term "free trade" appears seven times in a front page article in places where "trade" would have been more accurate? The point of course is that the trade agreements pursued by recent administrations, while named "free trade" agreements for public relations purposes, actually do not promote free trade. They often do little or nothing to reduce the barriers that protect highly paid professionals (e.g. doctors, lawyers, investment bankers) and actually increase some trade barriers, such as copyrights and patents. Reporters can both save ink and paper and increase accuracy by dropping the term "free."
I’m writing to you today with a sense of urgency that I haven’t felt since I began my journalism career. As executive editor of The American Prospect, I’ve witnessed firsthand how independent journalism serves as a crucial bulwark against the erosion of our democratic institutions. Today, that role is more vital than ever. Can you step up today and show your support?
The winds of authoritarianism are blowing stronger. We’re seeing alarming signs of a coordinated effort to silence critical voices and undermine the very foundations that support progressive causes. As Bob Kuttner presciently wrote in our August 2024 issue, a weaponized IRS could attack the very foundations of the progressive movement. We need readers to step up and help us dig in for the long haul.
We’re falling behind in our spring fundraising campaign, and with so much at stake we can’t afford to come up short. If you value fearless, independent journalism that holds the powerful accountable and defends democracy, now is the time to step up. The American Prospect depends on reader support to stay in the fight. Pitch in today and help us close the gap. Please consider making a donation today.
–David Dayen, Executive Editor
Copyright 2025 | The American Prospect, Inc. | All Rights Reserved
