The NYT must get this straight. With a counterfeit product the buyer is deceived. The buyers of the low-cost cell phone knock-offs in China are not being deceived. They are happily buying copies of name-brand phones which they know are not actual name-brand phones.
This distinction is very important for both economic and policy reasons. From an economic standpoint, there are large benefits from the sale of unauthorized copies that do not exist with counterfeit products. From a policy standpoint, the consumer will be an ally in a crackdown on counterfeits. This is not the case with unauthorized copies.
If you enjoyed this article, please consider making a tax-deductible donation today. For over 30 years, The American Prospect has delivered independent reporting that exposes corporate power, investigates political corruption, and analyzes threats to our democracy. Unlike many media outlets, we’re not owned by billionaires or corporations—we’re powered by readers like you.
Today’s independent journalism faces unprecedented challenges. Your support makes our reporting possible and keeps our work free and accessible to all. Whether it’s $5 or $50, every contribution helps sustain our nonprofit newsroom.
Join our community of supporters and make a donation today to help keep independent journalism thriving.
Copyright 2024 | The American Prospect, Inc. | All Rights Reserved