I'm trying really hard to get this John Dickerson piece to make sense. But I'm failing. "The test is whether bloggers will keep the press honest about the real, measurable political impact of the blogosphere." How could that possibly be true? Maybe if you're so self-obsessed with your job and your self that you've decided the primary purpose of bloggers is to offer incisive critiques of you and your profession, but who could possibly belie--
Oh. Now it makes sense.
