I'm hosting Health Wonk Review this week, where health wonks, uh, review each other's posts. Or something. No -- don't leave! It's fun!
We begin with the dashing Matt Holt, who explains how you can get cancer, get fired, become homeless, and lose your health insurance all in a few easy steps! I assume you'll see this one on self-help shelves wherever fine books are sold sometime soon, but you can read it at Spot-On first. Meanwhile, guest-posting over at Holt's blog, health care lobbyist Erik Novack doesn't like bureaucracy. Aye, tis a brave and bold stand the laddy takes! And speaking of bureaucracy, Tony Chen notices some odd maneuverings in the hospital industry.
Next we meet Emily DeVoto, who thinks Tyler Cowen's op-ed arguing that Americans pay out the nose for care because we're subsidizing a massive, world-leading research industry is, shall we say, unconvincing. I've always wondered, incidentally, what would happen if Republicans stood up at the debates and explained that they would, as a matter of policy, keep Americans paying exorbitant prices for pharmaceuticals in order to subsidize advances and discounts for Canadians. We are a generous people...but that generous?
My frequent interlocutor Michael Cannon is earning his Cato corner office by advocating the destruction of Medicaid and its transformation into nothing but block grants. And more block grants. And a couple more block grants. Because if there's anything states, with their inability to deficit spend when times turn bad, are good at, it's providing stable and reliable public services to the unstable and insecure populations that rely on them. While Michael is destroying Medicaid to "save" it, David WIlliams thinks he's got the answer to our health care problems more generally: Information. Julie Ferguson notices that employers think they have the answer too: On-site health clinics. And Jason Shamfrin explains what's right and wrong with everyone's favorite solution: Pay For Performance medicine.
Meanwhile, out in Oregon, the state is taxing smokers to fund health care 4 kidz. If there's anything I'm for, it's kids. If there's anything I'm against, it's smoking. These are brave political stands, I know, but my courage and principles sustain me through even the darkest of nights.
Bob Vineyard helpfully points out that the Citizen's Commission on on Health Care Awesomeness has returned recommendations for more awesomeness in health care. How that awesomeness will work, or who will pay for it, was not mentioned. And I point out, relatedly, that of course the Citizen's Commission is ridiculous, because public attitudes on health care are less coherent than a frat boy at dollar pints night. On the bright side, Americans will accept generous, universal benefits, for free, that don't raise taxes, ask them to exercise more, or in any way lend themselves to negative advertising.
Th-th-th-th-that's all folks. Thanks for coming to Health Wonk Review.
