Yet again (yeah, it's standard) the WSJ refers to the selective protectionism pursued by the United States in its trade policy as "free trade." Yes, tens of millions of people are upset about policies that are designed to put manufacturing workers in direct competition with low-paid workers in China and Mexico. The trade agreements allow doctors, lawyers, economists and other highly paid professionals to remain largely protected from such competition.
The latter group are obviously knuckle-scraping Neanderthals who fear the global economy. But, this group also has enormous political power, so trade agreements don't get written that make them face competition in the same way as auto or steel workers. It will be a huge step forward when this situation is discussed more honestly in the media.
There's too much at stake this November for us to quit. As we navigate another presidential election year, thoughtful independent journalism is more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on what's really happening across the country this election season, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in America.
Quality reporting doesn't come for free, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund our work. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make what we do possible. Any amount you give today will help sustain this crucial work.