Apparently Senator Charles Schumer and many Republicans think so according to the NYT. Couldn't the NYT find someone who does not think it is a good idea to hand someone a $15,000 check from the government just because they have bought a new home?
For purposes of comparison, this equal to roughly 5 years worth of a kid's health care under the State Children's Health Insurance Program and three years of TANF checks. It is difficult to see how someone is doing us any favors by buying a house. In many markets, there is still a bubble that has not yet fully deflated.
I suppose Schumer wants and the Republicans are hoping to keep these bubbles from deflating so that housing will be unaffordable for new families moving into these areas. Current home buyers can also expect to take a big hit when they sell their house a few years from now when we no longer are giving out $15k checks to home buyers and mortgage rates at back at 7 percent. However desirable these outcomes might be, it would be good if the NYT could weigh them against other potential uses of this money or find an analyst who could.
Unlike many news organizations, the Prospect has remained staunchly committed to keeping our journalism free and accessible to all. We believe that independent journalism is crucial for a functioning democracy—but quality reporting comes at a cost. From Trump’s threat to the free press to Musk’s influence on our democracy, there is too much at stake in 2025 to stop now.
We’re behind on our goal to raise $75,000 to continue delivering the hard-hitting investigative journalism you’ve come to expect from us. Your support helps us maintain our independence and dig deeper into the stories that matter most.
We need you to make a year-end contribution today. Any amount helps secure our future and ensure we can continue holding power to account.
