Readers who saw the coverage of former Senator Fred Thompson's proposal for cutting Social Security can be forgiven for thinking that the NYT reporters are supporting the strike by the Writers Guild. Thompson proposed changing the SS benefit formula so that benefits would be indexed to inflation rather than wages. Thompson then proposed using general revenue to make up the remaining Social Security shortfall.
If the NYT reporters weren't on strike, the article would have told readers that with Mr. Thompson's proposed benefit cut, the SS program would be in surplus forever. In other words, this change is far more than sufficient to eliminate the shortfall projected by either the Congressional Budget Office or the Social Security trustees. Therefore there would be no reason to ever use general revenue to pay Social Security benefits. Perhaps the NYT will clarify this point for readers after the strike ends.
Unlike many news organizations, the Prospect has remained staunchly committed to keeping our journalism free and accessible to all. We believe that independent journalism is crucial for a functioning democracy—but quality reporting comes at a cost.
This year, we’re aiming to raise $75,000 to continue delivering the hard-hitting investigative journalism you’ve come to expect from us. Your support helps us maintain our independence and dig deeper into the stories that matter most.
If you value our reporting, please consider making a contribution today. Any amount helps secure our future and ensure we can continue holding power to account.