The NYT has an article today about the University of Alabama's efforts to prevent an artist from painting pictures of their football players. Its case includes a request to prohibit his use of the school's "famous crimson and white color scheme." This is intellectual property rules gone crazy. It is also an extreme form of protectionism. Unfortunately, the NYT reporter never mentioned the economic angle here. If you impose a 10 percent tariffs on shoes, the Thomas Friedman crew start foaming. But, if you put an outright ban on a whole form of art (it ain't my bag, but people apparently buy it), they don't even think it's worth mentioning. If only we could require some minimal level of consistency among columnists (and economists).
--Dean Baker