I was asleep at the wheel earlier in the week when I let news reports about the downward revisions to unit labor costs pass without comment. According to several articles (see the NYT, for example) downward revisions to unit labor costs in 2nd and 3rd quarter in the release of the preliminary productivity data for the 3rd quarter alleviated concerns about inflation.
Well, I am not as concerned about inflation as many economists, but my fears were not alleviated by the new data. Quarterly data on unit labor costs are about as inaccurate as any data in the government's arsenal. While the Fed may be relieved to know that labor costs only rose at a 2.9 percent annual rate in the 3rd quarter, after falling at a 1.4 percent rate in the 2nd quarter, surely it was terrified by the fact that unit labor costs rose at a 13.6 percent annual rate in the first quarter.
The moral of this story is that serious people do not take quarterly data on unit labor costs seriously.
There's too much at stake this November for us to quit. As we navigate another presidential election year, thoughtful independent journalism is more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on what's really happening across the country this election season, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in America.
Quality reporting doesn't come for free, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund our work. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make what we do possible. Any amount you give today will help sustain this crucial work.