News of the housing crash and stock plunge has not yet reached the Washington Post (a.k.a. "Fox on 15th"). How else can one explain that two of their five deficit cutting measures involve reducing Social Security benefits. Certainly no one who had noticed the $15 trillion in lost housing and stock wealth by older workers and retirees would advocate taking away part of their Social Security, their one clear source of support in retirement.
This suggestion is especially outrageous since workers have already paid for these benefits through their Social Security taxes. As a result, the Social Security trust fund has accumulated enough bonds to cover benefit payments through 2049, according to the most recent projections from the Congressional Budget Office. It would be far more reasonable to suggest a partial default on the government debt, say a payment of 90 cents on the dollar. That would allow all bondholders to share the pain rather than just retired workers.
Unlike many news organizations, the Prospect has remained staunchly committed to keeping our journalism free and accessible to all. We believe that independent journalism is crucial for a functioning democracy—but quality reporting comes at a cost. From Trump’s threat to the free press to Musk’s influence on our democracy, there is too much at stake in 2025 to stop now.
We’re behind on our goal to raise $75,000 to continue delivering the hard-hitting investigative journalism you’ve come to expect from us. Your support helps us maintain our independence and dig deeper into the stories that matter most.
We need you to make a year-end contribution today. Any amount helps secure our future and ensure we can continue holding power to account.
