Just as Watergate became a metaphor for the Nixon era and Whitewater the right's symbol for Clinton, Enron is the emblem of the Bush administration's way of life. Enron is to George W. Bush what Teapot Dome was to Warren G. Harding. Its demise should also signal the collapse of a whole economic paradigm, in which smart people were traders and those left behind in the outmoded economy were throwbacks who actually made things.
Here is a checklist of the several icons that collapsed with the fallof Enron:
A pension double standard. Enron's retirement plan was heavily invested in its own stock. Executives cashed out over a billion dollars, while ordinary employees were locked in. Janice Farmer, who retired with $700,000 in Enron, told a Senate hearing last week that she is left with a $63 monthly Social Security check. Senators Corzine and Boxer propose a 20 percent limit for any one stock in 401(k) plans.
Bogus accounting. Since the Great Depression, the one form of regulation that even Wall Street has supported is the regulation of stock trades and corporate accounting. I once asked an ultra-Chicago economist if there was any regulatory agency that he endorsed. "The SEC," he said instantly, explaining that capitalism itself depends on honest information. Enron's entire game was to make its business plan so complex that neither investors nor regulators nor even its own auditors could penetrate it. While its core energy business made money (at the expense of consumers), it had speculative off-the-books subsidiaries. These borrowed heavily to make risky investments and eventually took the whole company down.
The business press. Enron's breathless cheerleaders included not only its owninsiders and stock touts but a business press that pronounced it the epitome of the new economy. It surely was that--epitomizing all the smoke and mirrors. In the wake of its collapse, Enron's former sycophants have turned on it, with Forbes and Fortune running scathing denunciations. BusinessWeekasked giddy Enron boosters what they thought now. (Gary Hamel, chairman of Strategos, before the collapse: "Enron isn't in the business of eking the last penny out of a dying business but of continuously creating radical new business concepts with huge upside." After: "Do I feel like an idiot? No, but if I misread this company in some way, I was one of a hell of a lot of people.") Well, yes. The one holdout among the business press is, of course, The Wall StreetJournal, still trying to blame the debacle on regulators.
Deregulation generally. Enron's collapse impeaches the conceit that a market economy can be efficiently self-policing. Enron fleeced consumers by manipulating prices of electricity and gas; it fleeced investors and its own employees. Tycoons do this because they can. Enron should signal a whole new era of re-regulation--of everything from electricity to pensions to accounting standards. And it is another warning that Social Security pensioners cannot trust Wall Street.
But the most powerful emblem of the Enron economy is notbusiness opportunism run riot but cronyism. CEO Ken Lay was wired to the Bushes.He personally gave the Republican Party $326 million in soft money in the threeyears before Bush's presidential campaign. Enron executives kicked in nearly $2million. Enron got special legislative treatment so that its operations fell inthe cracks between securities regulators and commodities regulators. When Laycomplained to Bush that the head of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commissionwasn't quite with the program, the man was replaced by a more docile successor.Enron flew Poppy and Barbara Bush to George W.'s inauguration. Even the newchairman of the Republican Party, Marc Racicot, is an Enron lobbyist.
Several congressional investigations are now picking through thewreckage. The details are bewilderingly complex, but the story line is veryfamiliar. The watchmen are tamed, bedazzled, or bribed, while a pitchman whoclaims to have invented something brand new in the history of capitalism takeseveryone to the cleaners. What remains is to connect the dots--and we can expectRepublican legislators to resist these investigations at every turn. For the dotslead directly to both the ideology and organization of George W. Bush.
