Posted by Nicholas Beaudrot of Electoral Math
Bar none, the best Christmas present I got this year was a copy of Robert Kennedy: His Life by Evan Thomas. And while I'm still a big fan of Bobby Kennedy, he's starting to make George W. Bush look like a civil libertarian.
During his tenure as attorney general, RFK routinely authorized thewiretapping of telephones and "bugging" of households and hotel rooms,all without a warrant. These wiretaps recorded domestic calls, and theFBI's bugs taped the personal conversations of their targets. Most ofthe time, the Feds were monitoring mobsters like Sam Giancana -- theChicago boss who replaced Al Capone -- but they also kept a close eyeon such subversives as Martin Luther King and several of his aides. Insome cases, particularly with King, Kennedy seemed to request thewiretap only for the purpose of obtaining knowledge of King's plannedact of civil disobedience, and not for any legitimate law enforcement purpose. Healso spent much of his spare time figuring out how he could get the CIAto overthrow and/or "eliminate" the Castro regime in Cuba.
In Kennedy's defense, the fourth amendment implications of wiretappingand bugging were not yet settled, and in many cases he authorized thewiretaps to placate Hoover, who used the FBI to gather intelligence helater used to threaten RFK, JFK, and many others with blackmail. Still,Kennedy's biography provides a great deal of perspective on how farwe've come as a country. It's easy to think that under President Bush, our civil liberties,the environment, the rule of law, and unchecked executive power aremore threatened now than they ever have been. But forty years ago,there was no EPA; the Warren Court had yet to establish Miranda and many of its other cases constraining police powers; and no one really seems to have thought twice about the way wiretapping might interact with the fourth amendment. For that matter African-Americans were completely disenfranchised rather than partially so, and efforts to integrate all-white colleges in the South resulted in actual riots that make the WTO protest of 1999 look like childs play. Now, that's not a reason to stop trying to improve the situation, and I think the biggest scandal in this whole snoopgate bruhaha is that FISA pretty clearly says "the United States shall not engage in X" and a fair reading of what the President has done shows that he has engaged in X, but in terms of the real, physical consequences of a President's actions, there have been much more serious consequences in the country's recent past.
