Mitt Romney just suggested that many of the 13 federal programs aimed at preventing teen pregnancy should be cut. "They're not working too well," he said, alluding to last week's news that teen pregnancy rates have risen for the first time in years. Does this mean Romney wants to cut the Bush administration's $50 million annually to fund abstinence only sex-ed, which science shows does nothing to keep young people healthy, informed, and pregnancy-free? --Dana Goldstein