It is possible to imagine that Bolton's interpersonal-skills disorders might cost him support among independent GOP senators. But it is nearly impossible to see how the White House could lose this fight over charges that, when you add them up, amount to the fact that Bolton is a hard-driving, ideological mega-jerk who likes to get his way even if it means running people into the ground to get it. How do these qualities become a sufficient disqualifier giving GOP senators enough cover to go against their president?
They don't!
For Democrats, however, it does not matter: The Bolton nomination is already paying dividends, and may continue to do so even if they lose. With little reason to think they could win, they've put up a fight and have refused to back off. They've come off looking organized and determined. And if they manage to win this fight, they may also begin to appear effective.
That's the shocker. All of a sudden, Democrats are shooting to kill.
By all the regular standards of modern-day Washington, Bolton has no right to be in trouble: He had the votes in committee, he had friends at the White House, and he was not sufficiently well-known for public demonization or ridicule. What's more, he was nominated to be ambassador to the UN, not a federal judge with a lifetime appointment who could have something to say about abortion or gay marriage.
Even though some have said the Bolton battle is a replay of the clash over foreign-policy ideology or manipulated intelligence, the truth is that if Bolton goes down, it'll be because he will have been found guilty of being too nasty, which used to be on par with blowing your nose too loudly in public.
But the winds are shifting. First, his support on the committee, at least temporarily, is greatly diminished. Second, it is no longer a certainty that President Bush can save Bolton. And third, he has achieved enough notoriety, to qualify as a punch line on the late-night comedy shows. And all of this is due to the fact that Democrats have suddenly become a party willing to take the fight to the death:
Yet it is worth noting that although Democrats may be fighting a more organized fight, you can't call it winning. Right now the question is whether Democrats have the guts to go nuclear themselves and block the Senate from doing business for months at a time. Fighting requires courage; a siege demands fortitude.
Terence Samuel is the chief congressional correspondent for U.S. News & World Report. His column about politics appears each week in the Prospect's online edition.