A couple of things: A couple of things:
- Melissa McEwan makes a good point with respect to Huckabee wanting to have it both ways when it comes to religion and politics. You can't both repeatedly stress your background as a preacher and your religious values and muse about teaching the non-science of "intelligent design" in public schools, but then complain when people ask about the latter.
- Both Yglesias and some commenters here are advancing the claim that Huckabee's surge should be seen as evidence that he's a serious contender for the nomination. I still think the original bank-shot conventional wisdom is correct -- that Huckabee could inflict serious damage on Romney but not actually win. Publius makes the key point: As Huckabee's apparently not having heard about N.I.E report on Iran makes clear, he just doesn't have the campaign infrastructure for a serious bid. After Iowa and New Hampshire, Huckabee's exceptional retail campaigning skills become virtually irrelevant, since he just doesn't have the organization to capitalize on an early victory. Even worse, the fact that the Hair Club For Growth and other pro-business factions within the party strongly oppose him means that not only will he not going get the resources to quickly build an organization, but whoever emerges as his strongest opponent will be lavishly funded. I suppose the race remains too fluid to completely rule out anybody who can win Iowa, but I still rank Huckabee a distant fifth among GOP candidates in terms of their chances of winning the nomination.
--Scott Lemieux
