In his monthly column, Princeton economist Alan Blinder gave President Obama an "A-" for his financial rescue plan, commending him for "wisely resisted the siren songs coming from both the left (“nationalize the banks”)."
Of course, Professor Blinder does not have a clue about what would have happened if we tried some path of nationalization. (This guy couldn't even see an $8 trillion housing bubble.) We do know what has happened in the absence of nationalization. The banks share of corporate profits now exceeds even the peaks reached in the bubble years. The executives at banks like Goldman Sachs stand to earn higher bonuses than ever before. Nothing has been done to prevent a comparable collapse in the future and there is every reason to believe that the financial sector will siphon off an even larger share of GDP in the future than it did in the past.
If this merits an "A-," then Professor Blinder is a very easy grader.
Unlike many news organizations, the Prospect has remained staunchly committed to keeping our journalism free and accessible to all. We believe that independent journalism is crucial for a functioning democracy—but quality reporting comes at a cost.
This year, we’re aiming to raise $75,000 to continue delivering the hard-hitting investigative journalism you’ve come to expect from us. Your support helps us maintain our independence and dig deeper into the stories that matter most.
If you value our reporting, please consider making a contribution today. Any amount helps secure our future and ensure we can continue holding power to account.
