In his monthly column, Princeton economist Alan Blinder gave President Obama an "A-" for his financial rescue plan, commending him for "wisely resisted the siren songs coming from both the left (“nationalize the banks”)."
Of course, Professor Blinder does not have a clue about what would have happened if we tried some path of nationalization. (This guy couldn't even see an $8 trillion housing bubble.) We do know what has happened in the absence of nationalization. The banks share of corporate profits now exceeds even the peaks reached in the bubble years. The executives at banks like Goldman Sachs stand to earn higher bonuses than ever before. Nothing has been done to prevent a comparable collapse in the future and there is every reason to believe that the financial sector will siphon off an even larger share of GDP in the future than it did in the past.
If this merits an "A-," then Professor Blinder is a very easy grader.
If you enjoyed this article, please consider making a tax-deductible donation today. For over 30 years, The American Prospect has delivered independent reporting that exposes corporate power, investigates political corruption, and analyzes threats to our democracy. Unlike many media outlets, we’re not owned by billionaires or corporations—we’re powered by readers like you.
Today’s independent journalism faces unprecedented challenges. Your support makes our reporting possible and keeps our work free and accessible to all. Whether it’s $5 or $50, every contribution helps sustain our nonprofit newsroom.
Join our community of supporters and make a donation today to help keep independent journalism thriving.
Copyright 2024 | The American Prospect, Inc. | All Rights Reserved
