For the second time in the last couple of months, the NYT ran an article on rising army desertion rates in which it compared the current rate to the Vietnam era desertion rate. Neither article pointed out that in the Vietnam era, the country had a military draft while the current army is comprised of people who have volunatrily enlisted. (Yes, I know many of these people enlist because they lack good prospects in the job market.)
This is an important difference. It is ridiculous to make the comparison with Vietnam without mentioning the draft.
The American Prospect is nonprofit, reader-funded journalism—and we need your help.
Our reporters dig deep, hold power to account, and explain how policy shapes people’s lives. If you value independent journalism that goes beyond the headlines, now’s the time to support it.
Here’s how you can help: • Donate to power fearless reporting
• Subscribe to get our print magazine 6x/year.
