For the second time in the last couple of months, the NYT ran an article on rising army desertion rates in which it compared the current rate to the Vietnam era desertion rate. Neither article pointed out that in the Vietnam era, the country had a military draft while the current army is comprised of people who have volunatrily enlisted. (Yes, I know many of these people enlist because they lack good prospects in the job market.)
This is an important difference. It is ridiculous to make the comparison with Vietnam without mentioning the draft.
If you enjoyed this article, please consider making a tax-deductible donation today. For over 30 years, The American Prospect has delivered independent reporting that exposes corporate power, investigates political corruption, and analyzes threats to our democracy. Unlike many media outlets, we’re not owned by billionaires or corporations—we’re powered by readers like you.
Today’s independent journalism faces unprecedented challenges. Your support makes our reporting possible and keeps our work free and accessible to all. Whether it’s $5 or $50, every contribution helps sustain our nonprofit newsroom.
Join our community of supporters and make a donation today to help keep independent journalism thriving.
Copyright 2025 | The American Prospect, Inc. | All Rights Reserved
